Subject	yes 91 is crappy but
Posted by	KraZyKyle on December 16, 2005 at 7:35 PM
	This message has been viewed 330 times.
In Reply To	you're Krazy, Kyle posted by aliaZ on December 16, 2005 at 07:14 PM
Message	if you tune right there is no problem running it. Thats all i got around there, you gota make due with what you have.
Follow Ups	Sport500 dyno 91 octane 16 psi with cats... - sorka 18:45:16 12/16/05 I would not go over 16psi on 91 octane - drmx 19:01:50 12/16/05 gj man, id say as long - KraZyKyle 19:02:46 12/16/05 what are you using for tunning. (n/m) - KraZyKyle 19:06:59 12/16/05 ConZult, LM-1 wide band....but I think I'm going to get - sorka 19:11:13 12/16/05 ya thats my deal too - KraZyKyle 19:14:58 12/16/05 you're Krazy, Kyle - aliaZ 19:14:08 12/16/05 ummmm - KraZyKyle 19:17:40 12/16/05 it is better to give yourself a buffer - aliaZ 19:23:40 12/16/05 AFR does not equal "safe". He didn't detonate at 16psi - Scotts94z32 17:55:15 12/17/05 Um, I've been running 16 for years now hot and cold.... - sorka 22:46:22 12/17/05 Hi Don, Actually, piss has 2 more octane points - SirpriZ 19:22:23 12/16/05 hehe...I believe ya - aliaZ 19:25:52 12/16/05 lol... recycled beer (n/m) - Dallas DamonZ 00:15:50 12/17/05 yes 91 is crappy but - KraZyKyle 19:35:32 12/16/05 Re: gj man, id say as long - sorka 19:16:28 12/16/05 well then - KraZyKyle 19:25:55 12/16/05 Huh? Who said I was stuck? - sorka 19:47:29 12/16/05 sorry, thats just what it sounded like to me (n/m) - KraZyKyle 20:36:18 12/16/05 That's a nice safe tune. If you're asking then: I wouldn't - SirpriZ 19:20:04 12/16/05 Re: Sport500 dyno 91 octane 16 psi with cats... - Rule12b 19:22:26 12/16/05 I got a ride in a Sport 500, 91 octane 16 psi with cats - BillZ2+2 19:27:44 12/16/05 How bad is it running stock plug gap on #6s? - sorka 19:54:24 12/16/05 Try .035 (n/m) - BillZ2+2 22:47:49 12/16/05 or even less for high(er) boost... (n/m) - Scotts94z32 17:57:09 12/17/05 My previous dyno from almost 4 years ago... - sorka 19:43:54 12/16/05 Same turbos, same psi, what has changed over the four years? - 300zx90 (CO) 21:13:39 12/16/05 PS. Congrats, the results look great :) (n/m) - 300zx90 (CO) 21:14:55 12/16/05 Thanks! (n/m) - sorka 21:38:05 12/16/05 Re: Same turbos, same psi, what has changed over the four ye - sorka 21:30:39 12/16/05 Re: Re: Same turbos, same psi, what has changed over the fou - sorka 21:41:40 12/16/05 Submit your dyno to www.itsgotturbo.com (n/m) - Broke_as_**** 20:40:59 12/16/05 Forgot to mention.... - sorka 21:12:23 12/16/05 1 bar is 14.5 psi. Bar and kg/cm**2 are often used - RHulme 21:20:19 12/16/05 PS one more confusing issue is the 1 bar = 1 atmosphere - RHulme 21:35:17 12/16/05 You're right..... - sorka 21:37:48 12/16/05 I saw a similar setup just today, dynoed 490rwhp range - Max865(ATL) 21:41:48 12/16/05 Doesn't sound like a Sp500 car to me. Lots of HP and no - Scotts94z32 17:49:45 12/17/05 maybe i rememberedd incorrectly - Max865(ATL) 18:07:14 12/17/05 460HP/490TQ sounds more reasonable (good #s!) for - Scotts94z32 18:48:59 12/17/05 YEP! That was my car....468.9hp/498.9torque.... - jgbatlantaZ 22:44:45 12/17/05 so i did get it mixed up ,oops :-) (n/m) - Max865(ATL) 23:46:13 12/17/05 Hey very good results I have a similiar set up - dream Z (MD) 22:09:23 12/16/05 I would not do what ^^^^ just said... too many variables, - Scotts94z32 18:55:05 12/17/05 also 1.0 bar is 14.7psi and 0.5 bar is 7.3psi (n/m) - dream Z (MD) 22:11:16 12/16/05 That's what I always thought, but I guess we were wrong..... - sorka 01:08:58 12/17/05 The elusive 1bar, LOL. I have heard people say it is 14.2 - Ash's Z 08:50:00 12/17/05 1 bar = 14.5037738 pounds per square inch - JokerF15 (NyxMotorsports) 22:49:47 12/17/05 NICE! Thats great man. a fun reliable pump gas car - CollegeBoy 03:20:03 12/17/05 very nice, I am hoping to have similar results (n/m) - Moxie 15:25:21 12/17/05 Good old DSR, eh? Remember that it's been cool here - Scotts94z32 17:53:52 12/17/05 Re: Good old DSR, eh? Remember that it's been cool here - sorka 22:48:37 12/17/05 Re: Good old DSR, eh? Remember that it's been cool here - sorka 22:49:59 12/17/05
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.