Subject	Those numbers are uncorrected according to the sheets.
Posted by	myzislow on December 13, 2005 at 1:10 PM
	This message has been viewed 23 times.
In Reply To	New dyno results. 688rwhp 632tq on stock engine. posted by NitroPow on December 13, 2005 at 12:53 PM
Message	nice none the less.
Follow Ups	New dyno results. 688rwhp 632tq on stock engine. - NitroPow 12:53:49 12/13/05 Wow, strong motor? (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 13:03:19 12/13/05 yikes, that needs some fuel tuning... - Z32POWER.com 13:03:27 12/13/05 Your dyno looks really interesting. - natottz 13:04:49 12/13/05 Even the cams are not for the MANUAL tt but from AUTO - NitroPow 13:07:23 12/13/05 stock exhaust? (n/m) - jmw23712 13:10:25 12/13/05 from profile - Atl300zxTT (Productive) 13:46:15 12/13/05 my bad, i just read the upgrades listed in the post. - jmw23712 14:41:57 12/13/05 Those numbers are uncorrected according to the sheets. - myzislow 13:10:47 12/13/05 Do you have SAE corrected map? (n/m) - Spongerider :) 13:11:31 12/13/05 Re: Do you have SAE corrected map? - NitroPow 13:20:35 12/13/05 Base (CAS) timing was 18.5^? If so, that's 20.5 overall, as - Scotts94z32 13:27:03 12/13/05 I data log all the runs using NProbe. ECU timing started - NitroPow 13:37:58 12/13/05 Yes, but the nProbe takes what YOU input as the timing, then - Scotts94z32 14:53:02 12/13/05 good numbers, - Max865(ATL) 14:02:21 12/13/05 i have seen weirder things...like chrome wheels where in the - Atl300zxTT (Productive) 14:36:58 12/13/05 or 2 non-running white Z's in the same household... :-) (n/m) - Max865(ATL) 19:48:50 12/13/05 one runs... - Atl300zxTT (Productive) 06:55:48 12/14/05 my bad ...lol (n/m) - Max865(ATL) 23:31:30 12/14/05 Interesting - that JWT program is running your car lean. (n/m) - Ash's Z 14:23:16 12/13/05 >>> - ztunerz 15:10:55 12/13/05 There are many more factors that could be the cause. - Ash's Z 15:16:35 12/13/05 Ash can it be that our CAS timing was 18.5 degrees? - NitroPow 15:59:07 12/13/05 Timing wont affect the A/F. I dont know exactly what the - Ash's Z 16:14:29 12/13/05 No we didnt swap. Basically even at lower boost - NitroPow 16:23:49 12/13/05 Tsk tsk tsk... Have you read my dyno dissertation? - Ash's Z 16:36:27 12/13/05 several issues with the setup .. but the numbers are nice : - Slowninja(The Devil's Z) 14:33:39 12/13/05 *agreed* and you (Dee) have a built engine, NitroPow does - Scotts94z32 14:55:54 12/13/05 2nd, at that power level, the stock pistons will not hold up - Ash's Z 15:12:53 12/13/05 keep him in mind if u need more pistonium (n/m) - Atl300zxTT (Productive) 15:17:52 12/13/05 Right? =) (n/m) - Ash's Z 15:19:37 12/13/05 extreme weight reduction, duh (n/m) - mousersix (San Antonio) 15:37:06 12/13/05 Scary part about that is the piece was just banging around - Ash's Z 16:15:33 12/13/05 >>> - ztunerz 15:14:10 12/13/05 Very nice number!! Congrat! But watch out for the A/F - timz 16:35:52 12/13/05 wow... (n/m) - tyreeztt 17:34:55 12/13/05 Very good, however stock rods are a weak link above 550HP!! (n/m) - citation 19:44:05 12/13/05 Says who? Stock rods have been capable of handling - Ash's Z 21:25:27 12/13/05 I want proof. - PennStateZ 00:50:25 12/14/05
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.