TwinTurbo.NET: Nissan 300ZX forum - Re: That makes more sence!
People Seeking Info
 
   


     
Subject Re: That makes more sence!
     
Posted by T0M on November 05, 2005 at 12:08 AM
  This message has been viewed 95 times.
     
In Reply To That makes more sence! posted by maglito on November 04, 2005 at 11:44 PM
     
Message :Yeah I like the 9.4" x 8" x 4.5" size best as I feel its the best compromise of everything and should flow well too (basically the face of the stillen and the thickness of the greddy).

i personally dont like the 4.5" thickness in the cramped side mount space, I feel a taller, thinner core will dissipate heat better which is why i went taller and kept the 3.5" thickness, you were on to something when you said you thought "tall" is key...
:Your endtank/piping orientation threw me off a bit.
:Looks like cool products you have there, a shame it has taken both you and Ash so long to come to market with this stuff.
:Have you completed a 2.5" intake piping kit for any of your SMICs yet?

I have 2.5"intercooler piping , also i have done 2.5" aluminum intake piping on a handful of z's as well.

:Also what are your thoughts on using 2.25" piping Turbo -> IC and then 2.5" piping from IC to TB?


I think the differences would be nominal. I really dont find the full 2.5" ic piping to be laggy at all, sp i dont see the need for limiting the size of the lower Ic pipe.
And Of the small handful of people with 60mm or 2.5" ic piping, I havent heard anyone complain about 2.5" piping kits feeling laggy or unresponsive either .

:Also, I'm sure you realize so as not to ruin much of the gain of the piping your customers should modify their plenum to accept 60mm TBs. Any idea of how many people have completed this mod thus far?

i have come across quite a few people doing it. i couldnt begin to guess how many are compeleted and running around tho.







AIM: turb0dem0n

     
Follow Ups  
     
Post a
Followup

You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.