Subject	Re: 17.5 lbs is actually on the heavy side for 16"
Posted by	DFG on October 24, 2005 at 4:58 PM
	This message has been viewed 25 times.
In Reply To	17.5 lbs is actually on the heavy side for 16" posted by chenc544 on October 24, 2005 at 04:49 PM
Message	Well, there's also the matter of looks....I kind of like the Borbet Type S, almost looks like the BBC RS-GT, but way less expensive!! But I'd have to see it on a Z...
Follow Ups	Borbet Type S Wheels - Stock replacement?? - DFG 16:29:22 10/24/05 17.5 lbs is actually on the heavy side for 16" - chenc544 16:49:17 10/24/05 Re: 17.5 lbs is actually on the heavy side for 16" - DFG 16:58:25 10/24/05 Why pay for less width? (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 16:58:50 10/24/05 2nd... (n/m) - Atl300zxTT (Less Lazy) 17:05:00 10/24/05 don't do it - mousersix (San Antonio) 17:06:10 10/24/05 7.5" + TT < 8.5" + TT < 9" + TT = Still no traction :) - chenc544 17:29:34 10/24/05 haha 2nd that, just got my new 17x9 5zigens mounted - mousersix (San Antonio) 17:48:38 10/24/05 I call BS until you post the pics... (n/m) - Luis (San Antonio) 18:59:09 10/24/05 Re: I call BS until you post the pics... - mousersix (San Antonio) 19:38:49 10/24/05 LOL I better not rely on you for photographic - Luis (San Antonio) 19:44:46 10/24/05 but the tread is so pretty.. (n/m) - mousersix (San Antonio) 20:29:12 10/24/05 hah.. anything + TT = no traction - Zfreak(Dallas) 18:09:13 10/24/05 mmmm ET streets :) (n/m) - Shawn300zTT GT28R MD 02:20:41 10/25/05
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.