| Message |
it still has only 1.5l of displacement at X rpm. Unless it is exceeding 100% VE...I don't she how it corresponds to the JWT compressor map and I haven't spend enough time looking at the "new" map yet (but I definitly will next week when I get some more time if it is not disproved by then). What I am tring to get to the bottom of here is which map is correct, because they are VERY different. If you buy a product (sport 700's) based on a specific set of specifications (compressor map) and suddenly (years after this product has been released) the advertised specifications change, one has a right to not only be very suspisious, but also very concerned. If this "new" map is correct than this is simply NOT the same product that was advertised that I paid good money for. It may still be a fine product, but it is NOT the product I thought I purchaced. You see why I have a right to be very concerned and demand better answers than, "yeah sebs car didn't do well at high PSI with those turbos, and there is something new on the garrett site, it much be right - riddle solved". Sorry, thats simply not enough of an explanation to me, a paying customer, and it shouldn't be enough of an explantion for anyone who purchaced these turbos, esp those who purchaced them from you. I appreciate your analogy and attempting to explain this to me in a very easy to understand manner, unfortunatly it still doesn't make sence based on how to read and plot areas on a compressor map. And I am afraid your oversimplified (but very kind) analogy don't make much sence with a turbo charged engine and it it were that simple flow charts would not exist (or at least the ablity to accuratly plot any place on them accuratly given engine displacement and speed). Regardless, maybe you are right and the original was/is a misleading/false map. I would just like to hear it from the horse's mouth (JWT/garrett - saying the first chart was wrong not just posting another one) or at least see more results (get a second opinion). I think you can understand why I am extremly interested in getting to the bottom of this.
 |
 |
