Subject	Doesn't this require an ECU tweak? (n/m)
Posted by	teahead on March 29, 2001 at 12:08 PM
	This message has been viewed 13 times.
In Reply To	AQUAMIST GB update: (For REAL this time). posted by nixit on March 29, 2001 at 11:11 AM
Message
Follow Ups	AQUAMIST GB update: (For REAL this time). - nixit 11:11:21 03/29/01 the cat is finally out of the bag :) (n/m) - wesman [92TT-less ] 11:18:22 03/29/01 I cand keep a secret. Besides...**I ACTUALLY ORDERED IT!** - nixit 11:23:37 03/29/01 Doesn't this require an ECU tweak? (n/m) - teahead 12:08:53 03/29/01 not necessarily... - nixit 12:30:02 03/29/01 A friend of mine in Vancouver's been using it for 3 years >> - Z-Jay (Canada) 12:16:08 03/29/01 23 psi on pump gas or race gas? (n/m) - Bernie 12:31:09 03/29/01 That was probably on his race gas program w/ 112+ octane. (n/m) - Z-Jay (Canada) 12:50:34 03/29/01 Well, then that's not terribly impressive... - Bernie 14:33:28 03/29/01 I'm shooting for a "bernie" sized TECH/DYNO results=1 MONTH - nixit 14:47:07 03/29/01 hehe... cool. can't wait to see it. :-) (n/m) - Bernie 17:55:24 03/29/01 I'll ask him to make sure, because I honestly can't remember (n/m) - Z-Jay (Canada) 15:02:08 03/29/01 oh, and what ambient temps at that 23psi with no detonation? (n/m) - Bernie 12:34:12 03/29/01 Remember, water injection suppresses detonation. It cools > - Z-Jay (Canada) 12:52:16 03/29/01
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.