Subject	No - JWT rates them at crank HP, not WHP (n/m)
Posted by	boileralum on July 17, 2005 at 7:33 PM
	This message has been viewed 32 times.
In Reply To	Read my question again. Does JWT over-rate them? posted by Onyx Z32 on July 17, 2005 at 07:11 PM
Message
Follow Ups	JWT Sport 530s = Garrett GT??R - Onyx Z32 15:59:23 07/17/05 I think Ash said it was similar to the GT28R - ZLover4Life 16:03:09 07/17/05 I just bought a pair and... - Onyx Z32 16:14:20 07/17/05 ok, that's a good reason - ZLover4Life 22:15:38 07/17/05 GT25R (n/m) - kuah@splparts.com 17:26:42 07/17/05 If Garrett rates the GT25R @ 250hp... - Onyx Z32 17:35:04 07/17/05 how many z's have u seen hit 530rwhp with a 530bb? - suprakillinz 18:05:39 07/17/05 Kyle had chris's car at like 500+ with 17 lbs of boost. - dilly yo 18:13:30 07/17/05 Fully built motor, most people just slap turbos on here - suprakillinz 18:18:03 07/17/05 Well you won't get full potential of alot of turbos unless - dilly yo 18:39:29 07/17/05 Actually that car did 482rwhp @ 17psi of boost - see LINK -> - Z-Jay (Edmonton, AB) 22:47:09 07/17/05 Read my question again. Does JWT over-rate them? - Onyx Z32 19:11:17 07/17/05 No - JWT rates them at crank HP, not WHP (n/m) - boileralum 19:33:00 07/17/05 Ah, ok that's where I've been going wrong. Thanks! (n/m) - Onyx Z32 19:35:17 07/17/05 Then again, I made 489RWHP on Sp500s *Shrug* (n/m) - Scotts94z32 23:01:19 07/17/05 JWT's crank HP ratings have always been "conservative". ;-) (n/m) - Z-Jay (Edmonton, AB) 23:58:12 07/17/05 That was also with weak wastegates.. it could have done more - Joe(NoVA) 20:34:25 07/17/05 Thanks, pulling up to Kat on thurs in a 996 turbos is - suprakillinz 21:54:09 07/17/05 Definitely a decent way to start out the night :-) (n/m) - Joe(NoVA) 09:27:33 07/18/05 JWT Turbos are rated at FLYWHEEL HORSEPOWER. - SeedyROM 23:15:45 07/17/05 I wasnt saying the turbos underperform. I was - suprakillinz 10:33:01 07/18/05 Haven't seen a GT25R, but GregD said they are NOT the - dilly yo 18:15:23 07/17/05 :)LOL (n/m) - yellowzxtt 20:08:02 07/17/05
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.