Subject	then it wouldnt be an NA (n/m)
Posted by	DougZXTT on July 16, 2005 at 5:48 PM
	This message has been viewed 74 times.
In Reply To	a turbo or two (n/m) posted by Schoch(NC) on July 15, 2005 at 07:58 PM
Message
Follow Ups	Anyone know what a N/A with a good driver would run at - steve_dowg2001 19:09:57 07/15/05 15.23561 (n/m) - my91z 19:19:18 07/15/05 Nah, it could do better than that. If I remember correctly.. - alecZ (NC) 19:20:26 07/15/05 Re: Anyone know what a N/A with a good driver would run at - steve_dowg2001 19:31:24 07/15/05 nawwwwwwwwwwssss - sfpearl300z 19:32:13 07/15/05 ok...... Vin Deisel..... (n/m) - Zski (The Forgotten Z) 20:25:40 07/15/05 too much $ to get an n/a to do that, not worth it (n/m) - PakiHomBoy 19:34:09 07/15/05 a turbo or two (n/m) - Schoch(NC) 19:58:20 07/15/05 then it wouldnt be an NA (n/m) - DougZXTT 17:48:31 07/16/05 My old 90 N/A w/nitrous had a best 1/4 of 13.21 - Zfreak(Dallas) 20:01:20 07/15/05 some guy on this site ran a 14.5 with a intake and welded - steve_dowg2001 20:11:24 07/15/05 You could try weight saving... - dmv300z 20:23:49 07/15/05 Same mods minus the ECU I was running low 14's. - ENVYMYZ 20:40:47 07/15/05 I thought you were going single turbo? (n/m) - dpjax 20:43:53 07/15/05 i ran a 14.6 on street tires...but could do better (n/m) - Z_LiFe 22:46:28 07/15/05 I ran a 15.0 w/ my 2+2...i had intake pulley and exhaust - Andrew(nj) 00:24:52 07/16/05
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.