| Message |
1. A size 10 shoe, looks exactly the same as a size 12 shoe, when shown in internet based photographs. Think about it. 2. There are CLEAR performance benefiting details that make it different from a stock manifold. But i've been privy to behind the scenes information, so I'm not sure if I can say. But they are in the pictures, you just need to know what to look for. 3. Mr Smith would not waste over a year plus developing a product unless he was sure to have some form of gains. You and I BOTH know this intimetly, as we've both been down the road of development. Give this product time, it has significant promise, to say the least. 4. If the actual Internal Volume of these manifolds were the exact same, but the product was shown as a pretty welded up mandrel bent exhaust manifold, *everyone* in this thread would have dicks/nipples the size of birthday candles (that wont blow out). Think about it. Cast, from a material that M.Smith has spent COUNTLESS months 'engineering', no welds, equal wall thickness, smoother bends, smoother internal walls, larger ID, ... I could go on, but maybe I am only one of the few that 'get it'. then again, i'm privy to some of the goings ons behind the scenes. i love being me. :hug:
Petz #3
|
 |