Subject	No. But the AGX rears are adjustable ON the car, which is
Posted by	Z-Jay (Edmonton, AB) on June 08, 2005 at 9:41 AM
	This message has been viewed 51 times.
In Reply To	Aren't the AGX a better shock? (n/m) posted by ENVYMYZ on June 08, 2005 at 07:13 AM
Message	why I went with them in the end. (I almost bought Koni Sports 3 years ago). Z-Jay Vice President - Edmonton Z Car Club 93 300ZX TT - Stage VI
Follow Ups	KONI sports - lifetime warranty - best bet? - foreverZ 01:06:07 06/08/05 how much are they??? (n/m) - 300zdett 01:33:23 06/08/05 each shock cost like 20 dollars more than KYB AGX - foreverZ 06:06:30 06/08/05 You have to either remove or cut up the rear trunk panels - YugoBernie (NoVA) 07:58:22 06/08/05 ..... not really - Luke@tirerack 08:01:59 06/08/05 You have to remove them to adjust them? That seems odd. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 08:11:56 06/08/05 that's the reason I run the KYB's on my car (n/m) - Luke@tirerack 08:30:31 06/08/05 Ditto. (n/m) - Z-Jay (Edmonton, AB) 09:42:03 06/08/05 there are a lot of koni apps that are that way. Basically - boileralum 08:51:25 06/08/05 Holy "not-so-adjustable-shocks!" Batman - 90Z-NA (ATL) 12:22:07 06/08/05 Wow, its not very often Bernie gets something wrong. ;-) You - Z-Jay (Edmonton, AB) 09:43:21 06/08/05 technically he didnt get it wrong, he just left info out - dogpile 16:00:21 06/08/05 "..., because they can only be set from the top..." (n/m) - Z-Jay (Edmonton, AB) 16:53:12 06/08/05 if you have to take them out, you have to remove/cut panels - dogpile 17:06:04 06/08/05 Aren't the AGX a better shock? (n/m) - ENVYMYZ 07:13:03 06/08/05 No. But the AGX rears are adjustable ON the car, which is - Z-Jay (Edmonton, AB) 09:41:20 06/08/05 no ..... - Luke@tirerack 07:59:56 06/08/05 was told by josh at tire rack that AGX only has 1 year - foreverZ 08:58:30 06/08/05 AGX has a lifetime warranty ....... (n/m) - Luke@tirerack 10:19:48 06/08/05 So i guess people at tire rack, just try to make a sale by - foreverZ 11:23:40 06/08/05 he's new guy and didn't know ... I corrected him personally (n/m) - Luke@tirerack 11:40:53 06/08/05 We need proof, show pictures of the ass whoopin'! - 90Z-NA (ATL) 12:20:21 06/08/05 he has the "green N" of immunity, no physical harm allowed (n/m) - Luke@tirerack 12:56:30 06/08/05 I thought it only applied to verbal/psychological beatings. - 90Z-NA (ATL) 13:02:09 06/08/05
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.