Subject	No issues is one thing but walking the thin line is another
Posted by	SeedyROM on May 13, 2005 at 2:55 AM
	This message has been viewed 36 times.
In Reply To	I had no problem when I was running 17psi on 91 posted by Moxie on May 12, 2005 at 02:09 PM
Message	It's like saying you can probably run your oil for 10,000 miles nowadays but it's still much safer to change it ever 3-5K. Sure a few people can get away with running 15 psi on 91 (some, as you are evidence of, can run even higher) but others have blown motors with less. And the ONE thing that destroys these cars is detonation. One bad tank of gas, one problem with fuel delivery and your margin for error is zero running that high of boost on lower octane gas. The guys that tune cars all day and drive around with $2000 wideband O2 units on the street to test real world conditions will all say the same thing. Be it Greg, Kyle or Kuah. But hey, it's your car and your risk to take. That much I know :) If you think defending quality shops and site sponsors with proven records makes him a whore, then you are the ones with the problem. Stop being bitches. - October 21, 2003 at 06:16 PM My Zs: www.zheaven.com - DOWN - Have a question about either of my 300ZXs? Answers lie within. Member: www.SoCalZCrew.com - Come find out how we do it in the West!
Follow Ups	Latest dyno results (sport 500s) - rodelb 13:37:26 05/12/05 Re: Latest dyno results (sport 500s) - Nismo_tt 13:44:58 05/12/05 12 and 21psi, I would be curious to see what's in between - ZEngineer 13:50:58 05/12/05 I would not recommend 17PSI on pump gas w/ JWT chip (n/m) - kuah@splparts.com 14:00:56 05/12/05 I'm gonna have to get my facts straight about this - ZEngineer 14:03:27 05/12/05 I had no problem when I was running 17psi on 91 - Moxie 14:09:25 05/12/05 No issues is one thing but walking the thin line is another - SeedyROM 02:55:59 05/13/05 Re: I'm gonna have to get my facts straight about this - kuah@splparts.com 14:16:13 05/12/05 interesting (n/m) - Moxie 14:25:45 05/12/05 I think you mean "scary" (n/m) - ZEngineer 14:27:38 05/12/05 from my experience.....You are 100% correct. (n/m) - spotz 14:44:04 05/12/05 Is that the same knock sensor reading on the AFCII !? - PLEAZURE in CA (SD) 15:38:26 05/12/05 Re: Is that the same knock sensor reading on the AFCII !? - kuah@splparts.com 16:18:01 05/12/05 Kuah, on 100 octane race gas you would have no - Zster (Big Red) 16:06:13 05/12/05 Re: Kuah, on 100 octane race gas you would have no - kuah@splparts.com 16:28:14 05/12/05 Also... - ZEngineer 14:06:58 05/12/05 Did you see the A/F from my dyno? - boileralum 14:23:43 05/12/05 that's it, I gotta start shopping for an AFC (n/m) - ZEngineer 14:26:49 05/12/05 Duh. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 15:19:12 05/12/05 *f'ing dhu (n/m) - Spee 18:09:21 05/12/05 I'm running 17 psi on Sport 500s and JWT chip on 93 octane. - myttzx 10:01:26 05/13/05 You're still curious about what's in between? Sheesh.. ;) (n/m) - Scotts94z32 14:06:15 05/12/05 Damn! Z lover - FORMULAFERRARI 13:55:37 05/12/05 heh i think i looked at taht longer than the dyno sheets - SimplyZ(MD) 13:57:37 05/12/05 Re: yeah, it cool to have a choice... - rodelb 14:18:13 05/12/05 That seems low to me - Moxie 14:06:22 05/12/05 Re: That seems low to me - rodelb 14:14:17 05/12/05 "On stock turbos, I put down 371rwhp at 17psi" - what a - Z-Jay (Edmonton, AB) 17:41:45 05/12/05 2nd... - Joe(NoVA) 14:25:12 05/12/05 Thirdeded. I thought 325rwhp seemed low as well. I made - zgene4 17:17:01 05/12/05
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.