| Message |
Members should banned for being honest, to the point, and factual. In fact, when they make those same demands of other members, they should be banned as well.
Whenever a member speaks falsely in an original post and it takes three posts to correct the false information, we should all ignore them for posting misleading information. Moreover, we should ban the members that seek to clarify the information.
Bravo.
.
.
.
Where I'm unclear is the logic behind this: Members are to ignore posts filled with false information. Yet, when members seek to clarify said information, you begin claiming, "It's this crap that hurts this place, just so you know."
If I'm to ignore complete lies, why can't you ignore brutal honesty? Granted, I should not have made the reply about supraforums; because, after all, it was completely truthful and I was trying to help him find a place that would be more tolerant and helpful.
------------
There are 10 types of people in this world: Those who understand binary and those who don't. |
 |
