Subject	Bet it had more to do with manufacturing costs than anything
Posted by	jzack on April 19, 2005 at 8:32 PM
	This message has been viewed 22 times.
In Reply To	Differences in upper water pipes... curious question > posted by whitepearlz on April 19, 2005 at 07:55 PM
Message	else. The Z is a bit overengineered. Maybe in the earlier years they manufactured the part that way and then found they could reduce the costs by doing w/out the grooves? Really not talking about a precision hi pressure fitting here?
Follow Ups	Differences in upper water pipes... curious question > - whitepearlz 19:55:51 04/19/05 if using silicone on both, it really doesnt matter - Z32POWER.com 20:06:21 04/19/05 well... in my opinion - bjammmin (SoCal) 20:06:50 04/19/05 2nd (n/m) - ZXRider(SoCal) 20:26:04 04/19/05 I'll 3rd that. - whitepearlz 20:28:28 04/19/05 Bet it had more to do with manufacturing costs than anything - jzack 20:32:57 04/19/05 The one with the groove is the newer style, Seals better. - Spddracer 20:40:46 04/19/05 I looks like the hole in the left one is bigger? Has it - ConVerTT 21:24:52 04/19/05 Sorry - "It looks like" ^^^^ - ConVerTT 21:26:10 04/19/05 The groove is there to keep you from dumping too much - YugoBernie (NoVA) 06:40:03 04/20/05 FYI, my 91TT has the grooved water pipe. (n/m) - USCZ 08:18:30 04/20/05 My 95 TT has the grooved water pipe. (n/m) - TT XTZ 09:31:52 04/20/05 I've also noticed differences in the OD where the bead is - Scotts94z32 12:21:43 04/20/05 Thanks guys. =) (n/m) - whitepearlz 14:22:31 04/20/05
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.