Subject	I've found they are related. If someone has a slow RT,
Posted by	Waco300zx on April 11, 2005 at 6:54 PM
	This message has been viewed 17 times.
In Reply To	RT doesn't matter, and has nothing to do with 60' posted by drmx on April 11, 2005 at 01:25 AM
Message	then GENERALLY they don't do to well in the shifts, therefore leading to higher 60's, and Et's. Not saying this is true for Blitz95, just that in my experience, I've seen this. When I first went to track, has bad RT, and bad 60's. As my RT came down, my 60's did as well, from the experience, and from quicker reflexes. I guess what I'm trying to say, is that OF COURSE RT has nothing to do with ET,or 60' directly, but it all has to do with reflexes/quickness. Better reflexes/quickness=better times. ============================================== Supritdeol:California, born and raised Waco300ZX:Obviously... That explains EVERYTHING... Dogpile: only i have no hose, so its more fun ^^My new Baby^^
Follow Ups	Finally had a good run at the track... :) - BlitZ95TT 20:30:10 04/10/05 Your 60' sucks - sfpearl300z 20:35:44 04/10/05 At least you hit 13s......this time...lol - spdracer300z 20:37:49 04/10/05 *strip (n/m) - Spee 21:32:13 04/10/05 Decent run, bro! >> - Arnel@Z32racing.com 22:31:47 04/10/05 Work on your RT, and 60', and you should get into - Waco300zx 22:33:57 04/10/05 RT doesn't matter, and has nothing to do with 60' - drmx 01:25:14 04/11/05 I've found they are related. If someone has a slow RT, - Waco300zx 18:54:41 04/11/05
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.