Subject	i'd say its not very bad for the second time ever at
Posted by	Z32POWER.com on March 20, 2005 at 8:32 PM
	This message has been viewed 45 times.
In Reply To	Isn't 11.7 a lil slow for "800rwhp?" (n/m) posted by trackstar on March 20, 2005 at 07:57 PM
Message	a drag strip with a pretty powerful car... but then again, everyone on tt.net knows way more than everyone else.
Follow Ups	Small vid of Antonio's Z at Etown last friday night.>>> - MikeVar82 18:54:03 03/20/05 Nice. (n/m) - ENVYMYZ 18:57:52 03/20/05 Cool (n/m) - PIRANHA 19:14:50 03/20/05 Good job (n/m) - unoulikZ (SoCal) 19:42:12 03/20/05 sweetness (n/m) - SamZTT 19:51:30 03/20/05 can you say smoked? (n/m) - Zrevolver 19:55:24 03/20/05 nice, hooked up real well (n/m) - CB300ZXTT 19:57:13 03/20/05 Isn't 11.7 a lil slow for "800rwhp?" (n/m) - trackstar 19:57:57 03/20/05 *850 (n/m) - Snoguitar 20:05:49 03/20/05 the tires spin after 100mph. hurts the ET a bit. (n/m) - genic 20:08:08 03/20/05 lol (n/m) - komplexZ 20:21:20 03/20/05 i'd say its not very bad for the second time ever at - Z32POWER.com 20:32:02 03/20/05 2nd (n/m) - hey GotBo0st 20:49:56 03/20/05 3rth, that car is 10 sec bound... - MyZ8u - GT28R Soon - 21:00:41 03/20/05 damn, beat me by a 10th of a sec. :( (n/m) - ZBlacktt 21:01:33 03/20/05 it should be.... (n/m) - genic 21:04:55 03/20/05 can we see your slip to compare? (n/m) - EricTTZ 00:10:58 03/21/05 why? i dont care about times or power (n/m) - genic 09:45:35 03/21/05 lol, just for comparison purposes - hey GotBo0st 14:52:24 03/21/05 then go get 18g's and you post ...if you want it so bad. (n/m) - genic 15:25:33 03/21/05 aww, somebody is embarrassed... - hey GotBo0st 20:00:17 03/21/05 i dont recall EVER asking for a 'time slip' ...however - genic 10:16:43 03/22/05 i never said you did - hey GotBo0st 12:26:31 03/22/05 ill post a time slip, but it will be measured in minutes - genic 12:54:12 03/22/05 3rd (n/m) - ZBlacktt 21:00:51 03/20/05 Considering 10s can be had with 500RWHP - SeedyROM 22:55:38 03/20/05 LOL...so true (n/m) - Only1Z 23:02:21 03/20/05 Re: Considering 10s can be had with 500RWHP - hey GotBo0st 23:27:24 03/20/05 hmm... - Snoguitar 02:10:16 03/21/05 hmmm... - hey GotBo0st 14:49:15 03/21/05 not bad! what was the 60ft? (n/m) - z324u 20:15:52 03/20/05 that's bad ass (n/m) - smoke TTZ 20:25:20 03/20/05 I think he told me it was a 2.0 60ft. (n/m) - Arnel@Z32racing.com 20:29:46 03/20/05 Decent! With traction he should be low low 11's. >> - Arnel@Z32racing.com 20:29:08 03/20/05 untuned on street tires and in the 11's im predicting - VG30DE racer 20:53:34 03/20/05 I think those were slicks, due to the fact he was running - TTZinOH 21:02:35 03/20/05 congrats, keep pushing to the 10s (n/m) - dpjax 21:26:49 03/20/05 Nice, but did he redlight? - Zach@300zxTwinTurbo.com 22:02:58 03/20/05 sweetness. get that tt trans. switch out the na trans - josh 08:29:32 03/21/05 No one comments on the trap - ~125mph is solid. Not 800RWHP - Scotts94z32 12:12:57 03/21/05 exactly, but remember, the car wasnt tuned and - hey GotBo0st 14:50:34 03/21/05 so we'll wait for another run, 800+RWHP should net a 140trap (n/m) - Scotts94z32 17:12:50 03/21/05 looks good looks good!!!! (n/m) - mge_1 16:02:10 03/21/05
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.