Subject	Why would tracks "require" tape? (n/m)
Posted by	Z-Jay (Edmonton, AB) on February 15, 2005 at 4:38 PM
	This message has been viewed 27 times.
In Reply To	thanks, yep - no tape required at those tracks (n/m) posted by maglito on February 15, 2005 at 03:07 PM
Message
Follow Ups	track pics Aspec fasica->damaged->Jspec "the transformation" - maglito 13:53:48 02/15/05 You need the lower foam piece and the metal retaininer - YugoBernie (NoVA) 13:57:44 02/15/05 i didnt think these were required?? (n/m) - JDMz32smity 14:06:56 02/15/05 I was sure to include the foam w. all the kits I sold (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 14:49:08 02/15/05 the warping problem was from the bodyshop cooking it - maglito 14:18:51 02/15/05 sorry, didn't read the post at..get tunnel vision on the - SadiqTT 15:54:33 02/15/05 Re: You need the lower foam piece and the metal retaininer - TheSlimOne 21:17:46 02/15/05 2 things keep the front bumper from being wavy like that. - YugoBernie (NoVA) 16:39:52 02/16/05 don't want the weight of the tape to slow you down? - Rage (SoCal) 14:31:58 02/15/05 thanks, yep - no tape required at those tracks (n/m) - maglito 15:07:22 02/15/05 Why would tracks "require" tape? (n/m) - Z-Jay (Edmonton, AB) 16:38:00 02/15/05 To help in case a rock hits the headlights. - punkz (Dallas) 16:43:07 02/15/05 Does NE1 know if those IC foglight ducts would help the > - Z-Jay (Edmonton, AB) 16:38:48 02/15/05 Not really - they are stock height after all. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 23:19:55 02/15/05 i think that i agree about certain colors being better - Z U N L 18:56:24 02/15/05
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.