Subject	I haven't seen any dynos that say u will make less
Posted by	Slowninja(GT-675 R Inconel Z) on January 06, 2005 at 12:07 AM
	This message has been viewed 51 times.
In Reply To	Well think about it, we have full dual exhaust which means posted by YugoBernie (NoVA) on January 05, 2005 at 11:57 PM
Message	power and or torque with a 3 inch exhaust vs 2 inch exhaust. Seems to me the more air you can move in and out will only help if the car is tuned correctly for it. Keeping the spirit of dyno proof alive, show me the proof in this myth. I have to imagine after 500rwhp, there has to be a benefit. 99 Yamaha R1 ( the blue 1 ) 91 Nissan Pathfinder "What, are you afraid that only a couple of good ones have rolled off the production lines and the rest are crap?? ... Its mechanics not the stockmarket." ... ZisLuv on May 03, 2004 at 6:12 PM "Chips are like condoms, if u have the typical equipment, the standard run of the mill ole jalopy type fixtures work just fine -- may not have the kick that others do but gets the job done ... if u have something that is designed to perform like a race horse, well strap that baby with the right "get up and go" parts ... and hold on ..." ..... Slowninja(GT-675 R Inconel Z) on January 04, 2005 at 2:45 PM "You think when you go to a bar with your girlfriend, every other guy there is gonna be your best friend? Welcome to reality." ........ dilo on January 04, 2005 at 4:02 PM pump fuel : 519 rwhp / 502 torque sunoco 104 race fuel : 604 rwhp / 544 torque Dyno Charts - La-Z-Link La-Z-Link
Follow Ups	What's the magic HP number to warrant a 3" exhaust? (n/m) - mr. zed line 22:51:18 01/05/05 876.456rwhp (n/m) - Tissan© 22:52:17 01/05/05 i thought it was 879.666? (n/m) - Rbadger 22:55:38 01/05/05 no moron. (n/m) - Tissan© 22:59:04 01/05/05 Both wrong, it's 3000.0000006hp. :) (n/m) - ZFreak (Dallas) 23:04:45 01/05/05 1800rwhp (n/m) - SpooledUpZ 23:02:07 01/05/05 500+ (n/m) - BradZ (FL) 23:14:17 01/05/05 not on our cars. (n/m) - Spee 23:38:38 01/05/05 brad, spee, my post was not ment for you guys! - tecnobnz 23:43:10 01/05/05 emphasis on the plus sign... - BradZ (FL) 00:07:47 01/06/05 maybe 800+ - Spee 17:33:18 01/06/05 what the hell people.... he was asking for help - tecnobnz 23:42:15 01/05/05 Well think about it, we have full dual exhaust which means - YugoBernie (NoVA) 23:57:19 01/05/05 I haven't seen any dynos that say u will make less - Slowninja(GT-675 R Inconel Z) 00:07:12 01/06/05 You can imagine whatever you like. But the fact is that - YugoBernie (NoVA) 00:35:14 01/06/05 and reduce the velocity of the gas impulse flow (n/m) - CHUNG (Dallas) 01:08:25 01/06/05 Not to be a smartass but... - hades 01:07:11 01/06/05 39.25/78.5sqin? rofl (n/m) - Snoguitar 01:21:49 01/06/05 wow a mathlete. (n/m) - SaipanZ(MP) 01:45:35 01/06/05 You are hardly a smart ass. (n/m) - SactoTodd 02:15:04 01/06/05 No... - College Boy 02:17:59 01/06/05 9.81747703125 vs. 19.6349540625 (n/m) - Snoguitar 02:22:31 01/06/05 um..yes..what I typed :) (n/m) - College Boy 02:26:55 01/06/05 9.987 != 9.817. Can't see how you came up with 9.987, typo? (n/m) - Snoguitar 02:30:12 01/06/05 oops..typo..my bad..i make a lot of them..I was wondering - College Boy 13:27:48 01/06/05 So yes... - College Boy 02:24:07 01/06/05 What the hell are you talking about? - Marshall 10:46:47 01/06/05 You forgot it's radius, not diameter... that's your problemo - Scotts94z32 11:08:41 01/06/05 Wow! That's one big exhaust pipe (n/m) - NytWolf 12:25:31 01/06/05 Two 2.5" pipes flow slightly more than a single 3.5" pipe. (n/m) - Snoguitar 01:18:24 01/06/05 easy way to figure it out - Marshall 10:54:12 01/06/05 According to Garrett researchers... >>> - Scotts94z32 10:53:40 01/06/05
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.