Subject	what're you planning on changing to compensate for lag?
Posted by	Rbadger on January 04, 2005 at 11:24 AM
	This message has been viewed 32 times.
In Reply To	When I bought my turbos they were very under rated. posted by Woody75 (Denver) on January 04, 2005 at 10:09 AM
Message	diff manifolds? headwork?
Follow Ups	Congrats Scotts94z32, Makes me happy to see a sp500 - Eishozzz 05:06:40 01/04/05 he has NA rear end (n/m) - Jzx (next-gear.com) 05:31:42 01/04/05 500 rwhp can be obtained with sport 500s and manifolds, - neurozurgeon 08:43:46 01/04/05 I like having 500 rwhp on pump gas with room to spare. - Woody75 (Denver) 09:16:20 01/04/05 To each his own... - neurozurgeon 09:54:26 01/04/05 You missed my point. I'm not talking about track power. - Woody75 (Denver) 10:01:56 01/04/05 How would you classify theses turbos>> - XTZ2 10:39:42 01/04/05 If you want a pure track car, they are not the ones to get. - Woody75 (Denver) 11:21:11 01/04/05 ditto... we could have easily gotten to 500RWHP, but I was - Scotts94z32 10:51:31 01/04/05 You say your turbos are putting out more power than claimed> - XTZ2 09:55:20 01/04/05 he's been changing and tuning as to get the most performance - DragonSi 10:01:54 01/04/05 Not at all. Turbo is staying the same. (n/m) - Woody75 (Denver) 10:02:55 01/04/05 When I bought my turbos they were very under rated. - Woody75 (Denver) 10:09:25 01/04/05 what're you planning on changing to compensate for lag? - Rbadger 11:24:58 01/04/05 Cams/head work and higher compression. (n/m) - Woody75 (Denver) 11:30:27 01/04/05 higher compression is going to adversely affect max boost - Rbadger 12:00:41 01/04/05 Max power is overrated. Useable power is where it's at. (n/m) - nixit 12:19:14 01/04/05 i know that...i'm just trying to understand... - Rbadger 12:23:10 01/04/05 what I know on the subject - SactoTodd 12:45:42 01/04/05 I was hoping you would comment on my dyno post... - Scotts94z32 12:29:24 01/04/05 i glanced. - nixit 12:50:34 01/04/05 depends - PhishZ 12:34:42 01/04/05 Re: depends - nixit 12:47:31 01/04/05 Yep, those are the ones. And I think they are 9.2:1 - Woody75 (Denver) 13:29:17 01/04/05
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.