 |
   |
|
| |
|
|
| Subject |
Re: TT vs NA. IMHO, the NA is faster (read why) |
|
| |
|
|
| Posted by |
Ken Smoot on December 26, 2004 at 9:09 PM |
|
| |
This message has been viewed 185 times. |
|
| |
|
|
| In Reply To |
Z are a pleasure to drive, but definitely not an investment. posted by 94Z32XTT on December 26, 2004 at 03:51 AM |
|
| |
|
|
| Message |
In a straight line, no question, the TT will blow the doors of a NA. However, the world doesn't exist in a straight line, therein lies the difference. At a road racing track, the NA is much more "user friendly". It is easy to extract what the car is capable of. The power (and wheel spin) of the TT plus the turbo lag are a detriment to fast lap times for all but the very highly skilled TT drivers. You can use the NA's power a lot easier than that of the TT. As an old hand at wheel to wheel racing I like the fact that, with a few mods, the NA can hold its own with other non-turbo sportscars, something that can not be said of the TT without some major mods. And, yes, on more than one occassion, have gotten better lap times in a NA than on a TT.
|
|
| |
|
|
| Follow Ups |
|
|
| |
|
|
Post a
Followup |
You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
21:09:37 12/26/04
