Subject	Well if you want to get technical....
Posted by	Woody75 (Denver) on October 28, 2004 at 8:06 AM
	This message has been viewed 22 times.
In Reply To	ok... i see. posted by kickerzx on October 28, 2004 at 07:59 AM
Message	"the idea for this is to not having to pay for a lot of options i dont need" You don't need the Zem either. A normal JWT eprom works just fine :) JackB nimble JackB quick JackB can suck my dick =P - james-lee 11/02/01 Arrogance is the #1 weapon against Supra Owners - MikeH 08/06/02 Dallas with a Z: I like the bulge dude 05/02/03 Bezbefootball: Does dick have anything for me? 10/21/03
Follow Ups	dual maf WITHOUT the apexi unit... - kickerzx 07:01:10 10/28/04 pretty cool idea - Jonezy 07:42:17 10/28/04 no. for that much I'd just buy an AFC - aliaZ 07:43:04 10/28/04 ok... i see. - kickerzx 07:59:52 10/28/04 Well if you want to get technical.... - Woody75 (Denver) 08:06:48 10/28/04 Re: Well if you want to get technical.... - kickerzx 08:11:41 10/28/04 Re: ok... i see. - aliaZ 08:35:31 10/28/04 Explain how the unit is going to work? (n/m) - ImTheDevil 08:58:11 10/28/04 Re: Explain how the unit is going to work? - kickerzx 09:06:36 10/28/04 So you still need a dual pop eprom program (n/m) - boileralum 09:26:32 10/28/04 Re: So you still need a dual pop eprom program - kickerzx 09:42:58 10/28/04 What is the purpose if there is no tune-ability? (n/m) - ImTheDevil 10:36:11 10/28/04 this would be ideal for those with a zemulator - aliaZ 11:14:49 10/28/04 that doesnt make any sense - AntiHero 11:42:24 10/28/04 if the MAF voltage isn't linear with respect to flow rate, - boileralum 14:13:55 10/28/04 I already have a schematic for this type of device - AzHeat 10:34:12 10/28/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.