TwinTurbo.NET: Nissan 300ZX forum - omg (n/m)
Subject
omg (n/m)
Posted by
Halo Z
on October 11, 2004 at 9:05 AM
This message has been viewed
25
times.
In Reply To
Is 2.3 and 2.5 degree front camber problematic for tire
posted by PLEAZURE in CA (SD)
on October 10, 2004 at 11:24 PM
Message
Follow Ups
Is 2.3 and 2.5 degree front camber problematic for tire
-
PLEAZURE in CA (SD)
23:24:13 10/10/04
I just wasted $550 in tires with 2.75 on my rear tires
-
SeedyROM
23:26:23 10/10/04
check ur mail hoe. respond. :P (n/m)
-
spotz
23:28:46 10/10/04
Did you get my reply to your email ?
-
PLEAZURE in CA (SD)
23:36:20 10/10/04
need the rear ones and the fender pieces.
-
spotz
02:18:22 10/11/04
I don't see anything
-
SeedyROM
23:38:20 10/10/04
And if that wasn't clear, it's even worse for the front
-
SeedyROM
23:30:00 10/10/04
My rears are -1.6 and -1.2 I always get perfect wear
-
PLEAZURE in CA (SD)
23:32:47 10/10/04
Yeah, mentioned it below :)
-
SeedyROM
23:35:44 10/10/04
Its more likely that you have another alignment issue.
-
Toso
11:31:20 10/11/04
thanks for those kazamas a few months ago! (n/m)
-
josh
13:14:09 10/11/04
Wasn't that over a year ago? ;) (n/m)
-
SeedyROM
15:18:42 10/11/04
Damn. -2.5 deg is what I run on my track car. (n/m)
-
John(Houston)
23:31:04 10/10/04
Why is it so far off?
-
Snoguitar
23:34:33 10/10/04
Could me somehow related to the 350Z wheels offset
-
PLEAZURE in CA (SD)
23:37:46 10/10/04
Maybe, I'm not sure...
-
Snoguitar
23:55:13 10/10/04
Yeah, mine was roughly that with my Eicbach set like his
-
SeedyROM
23:39:13 10/10/04
For a person who doesn't see the track, that is too much
-
Zster (Big Red)
23:37:05 10/10/04
It's not possible for your camber to be that off w. the
-
YugoBernie (NoVA)
23:37:06 10/10/04
That's a sharp analysis >> read more
-
PLEAZURE in CA (SD)
23:55:34 10/10/04
Your springs are probably shot (n/m)
-
Guapo
23:57:47 10/10/04
Yes possible .. I have an extra set here and I need to know>
-
PLEAZURE in CA (SD)
00:11:57 10/11/04
Flip-switch suspension was not offered on the TT in Japan. (n/m)
-
YugoBernie (NoVA)
00:18:00 10/11/04
haaaa .. thanks .. so these are the same shocks as NA
-
PLEAZURE in CA (SD)
00:21:03 10/11/04
The p/n doesn't cross-ref w. anything in the JDM fische.
-
YugoBernie (NoVA)
00:24:33 10/11/04
Might consider updating your profile before asking questions (n/m)
-
Snoguitar
23:58:02 10/10/04
Sorry .. the work was done few days ago
-
PLEAZURE in CA (SD)
23:58:44 10/10/04
If you have that camber with the 300 degree kit
-
Guapo
23:37:18 10/10/04
That is excessive for the street,
-
Barry'Z(NJ)
23:38:06 10/10/04
Easy Fix >>
-
Coz@CZP
02:35:49 10/11/04
Can order necessary equip.
-
CowBoy--TT Conversion Underway
03:42:01 10/11/04
Another way to look at it- How many miles/year do you drive?
-
DJG(MI)
08:15:35 10/11/04
omg (n/m) -
Halo Z
09:05:29 10/11/04
Camber does not cause tire wear!
-
Toso
11:26:15 10/11/04
It's the same thing though...
-
SeedyROM
12:43:05 10/11/04
Not exactly.
-
Toso
12:55:47 10/11/04
toe and camber control tire wear on the streets. (n/m)
-
josh
13:20:36 10/11/04
They key word there is "shouldn't"
-
SeedyROM
13:26:25 10/11/04
I think there is a little confusion here.
-
Toso
13:55:36 10/11/04
So you are saying that my tires should not wear on the inner
-
PLEAZURE in CA (SD)
16:36:28 10/11/04
It will wear on the inner side of the tire.
-
Toso
11:22:31 10/12/04
Very important correction;
-
nixit
16:45:57 10/11/04
I understand all of that.
-
Toso
11:26:10 10/12/04
you know what, your 100% wrong.
-
nixit
16:55:50 10/11/04
Re: you know what, your 100% wrong.
-
Toso
11:35:40 10/12/04
Post a
Followup
You cannot reply to this message because you are not
logged in
.