Subject	Damn. -2.5 deg is what I run on my track car. (n/m)
Posted by	John(Houston) on October 10, 2004 at 11:31 PM
	This message has been viewed 21 times.
In Reply To	Is 2.3 and 2.5 degree front camber problematic for tire posted by PLEAZURE in CA (SD) on October 10, 2004 at 11:24 PM
Message
Follow Ups	Is 2.3 and 2.5 degree front camber problematic for tire - PLEAZURE in CA (SD) 23:24:13 10/10/04 I just wasted $550 in tires with 2.75 on my rear tires - SeedyROM 23:26:23 10/10/04 check ur mail hoe. respond. :P (n/m) - spotz 23:28:46 10/10/04 Did you get my reply to your email ? - PLEAZURE in CA (SD) 23:36:20 10/10/04 need the rear ones and the fender pieces. - spotz 02:18:22 10/11/04 I don't see anything - SeedyROM 23:38:20 10/10/04 And if that wasn't clear, it's even worse for the front - SeedyROM 23:30:00 10/10/04 My rears are -1.6 and -1.2 I always get perfect wear - PLEAZURE in CA (SD) 23:32:47 10/10/04 Yeah, mentioned it below :) - SeedyROM 23:35:44 10/10/04 Its more likely that you have another alignment issue. - Toso 11:31:20 10/11/04 thanks for those kazamas a few months ago! (n/m) - josh 13:14:09 10/11/04 Wasn't that over a year ago? ;) (n/m) - SeedyROM 15:18:42 10/11/04 Damn. -2.5 deg is what I run on my track car. (n/m) - John(Houston) 23:31:04 10/10/04 Why is it so far off? - Snoguitar 23:34:33 10/10/04 Could me somehow related to the 350Z wheels offset - PLEAZURE in CA (SD) 23:37:46 10/10/04 Maybe, I'm not sure... - Snoguitar 23:55:13 10/10/04 Yeah, mine was roughly that with my Eicbach set like his - SeedyROM 23:39:13 10/10/04 For a person who doesn't see the track, that is too much - Zster (Big Red) 23:37:05 10/10/04 It's not possible for your camber to be that off w. the - YugoBernie (NoVA) 23:37:06 10/10/04 That's a sharp analysis >> read more - PLEAZURE in CA (SD) 23:55:34 10/10/04 Your springs are probably shot (n/m) - Guapo 23:57:47 10/10/04 Yes possible .. I have an extra set here and I need to know> - PLEAZURE in CA (SD) 00:11:57 10/11/04 Flip-switch suspension was not offered on the TT in Japan. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 00:18:00 10/11/04 haaaa .. thanks .. so these are the same shocks as NA - PLEAZURE in CA (SD) 00:21:03 10/11/04 The p/n doesn't cross-ref w. anything in the JDM fische. - YugoBernie (NoVA) 00:24:33 10/11/04 Might consider updating your profile before asking questions (n/m) - Snoguitar 23:58:02 10/10/04 Sorry .. the work was done few days ago - PLEAZURE in CA (SD) 23:58:44 10/10/04 If you have that camber with the 300 degree kit - Guapo 23:37:18 10/10/04 That is excessive for the street, - Barry'Z(NJ) 23:38:06 10/10/04 Easy Fix >> - Coz@CZP 02:35:49 10/11/04 Can order necessary equip. - CowBoy--TT Conversion Underway 03:42:01 10/11/04 Another way to look at it- How many miles/year do you drive? - DJG(MI) 08:15:35 10/11/04 omg (n/m) - Halo Z 09:05:29 10/11/04 Camber does not cause tire wear! - Toso 11:26:15 10/11/04 It's the same thing though... - SeedyROM 12:43:05 10/11/04 Not exactly. - Toso 12:55:47 10/11/04 toe and camber control tire wear on the streets. (n/m) - josh 13:20:36 10/11/04 They key word there is "shouldn't" - SeedyROM 13:26:25 10/11/04 I think there is a little confusion here. - Toso 13:55:36 10/11/04 So you are saying that my tires should not wear on the inner - PLEAZURE in CA (SD) 16:36:28 10/11/04 It will wear on the inner side of the tire. - Toso 11:22:31 10/12/04 Very important correction; - nixit 16:45:57 10/11/04 I understand all of that. - Toso 11:26:10 10/12/04 you know what, your 100% wrong. - nixit 16:55:50 10/11/04 Re: you know what, your 100% wrong. - Toso 11:35:40 10/12/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.