Subject	I think a more correct statement would be
Posted by	KaZ (VaBch) on September 30, 2004 at 2:23 PM
	This message has been viewed 37 times.
In Reply To	Is This true about all 90Z's? posted by Bouncer068 on September 30, 2004 at 08:47 AM
Message	The '90 Heads are more PRONE to problems but it would be due to the CAMSHAFT, not the head. The CAS key has been known to be more susceptible to issues from jamming the CAS on the car during improper installation. All Zs CAN have this problem... the 90s were simply a little more prone. There were also more Zs in 90 than any other year, so obviously the sheer number of Zs having the problem would be higher, because there were more made and sold that year. KaZ (VaBch) - "Unique Z" Back to the crap '84 S12 CA18ET Silvia '88 Z31 VG30E Fairlady Z - Beater '91 Z32 [ Project ] Fairlady Z '97 A32 VQ30DE Cefiro AIM - KaZsMiR / E-mail @ Hotmail - casimijg "Forumers are like economists: They state the obvious, give bad advice, and simply can't agree with each other." - Someone Else
Follow Ups	Is This true about all 90Z's? - Bouncer068 08:47:15 09/30/04 My NA has 96k and i have had no problems with the heads (n/m) - Atl300zxTT 08:50:31 09/30/04 105K on my '90 TT - no problems of that type. (n/m) - Dave N 08:50:47 09/30/04 driver error, loose nuts, the list goes on (n/m) - JDMz32smity 08:57:38 09/30/04 You must be thinking of Tony, aka BigTDogg, aka loose nutz - Dave N 09:29:42 09/30/04 My 2+2 has 187k miles and i've got no signs of problems (n/m) - jkperformance 09:05:04 09/30/04 The early production 90 Zs had a problem with soft valve - Jonezy 09:05:27 09/30/04 True, but most if not all of these Z's are already fixed or - FlawleZ 09:31:37 09/30/04 193k and running strong... - fantomZ(OH) 09:06:57 09/30/04 oh yeah, and mine was actually produced in 89 (n/m) - fantomZ(OH) 09:12:26 09/30/04 Most of the 90's have 89 production dates. (n/m) - FlawleZ 09:30:13 09/30/04 mine was produced in May of 90 and I've had no problems. (n/m) - doug8867 10:30:28 09/30/04 2nd: Production date 7/89, serial #786 for mine. (n/m) - Dave N 09:30:18 09/30/04 pfft, February 89, S/N 000028 here :-) (n/m) - ZEngineer (TT) 10:28:59 09/30/04 But that's for the chassis, you ripped out the motor - Dave N 12:23:47 09/30/04 way to piss on my parade.....jerk :-( (n/m) - ZEngineer (TT) 12:40:42 09/30/04 i had 155k on the first z... no problems (n/m) - halik 09:29:56 09/30/04 I'm told it's true.... and it happened to me - Angry Z 10:45:09 09/30/04 ??? - Guapo 10:54:59 09/30/04 Re:??? - Angry Z 11:37:09 09/30/04 if motors are lasting to 190k I'd hardly call it a problem. (n/m) - Guapo 11:52:52 09/30/04 12/89 build date.. no head problems (n/m) - 90BlkZ18 12:23:10 09/30/04 The TSB is inside the link you provided...more info> - cainmt (Toledo,OH) 17:24:15 09/30/04 Nope...my head is great. (n/m) - Milo (Sport Z Magazine) 12:22:22 09/30/04 I think a more correct statement would be - KaZ (VaBch) 14:23:47 09/30/04 90 TT ran 256,000 miles before pass. side headgasket leak (n/m) - Fly-Surf 14:46:01 09/30/04 Re: Is This true about all 90Z's? - Bouncer068 17:20:02 09/30/04 read my post above, good luck. (n/m) - cainmt (Toledo,OH) 17:26:11 09/30/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.