Subject	It's a pretty quick little rocket.
Posted by	my_humble_300zx on August 30, 2004 at 2:56 PM
	This message has been viewed 32 times.
In Reply To	is a honda s2k even as fast as a stock tt? (n/m) posted by Nadir(Detroit) on August 30, 2004 at 02:45 PM
Message	[ http://www.edmunds.com/used/2003/honda/s2000/100183162/prices.html?tid=edmunds.u.mipmake.pricetable.num1.1.honda ]* Just some specs on it: Acceleration (0-60 mph): 6.1 sec. Braking Distance (60-0 mph): 121 ft. Base Number of Cylinders: 4 Base Engine Size: 2 liters Base Engine Type: Inline 4 Horsepower: 240 hp Max Horsepower: 8300 rpm Torque: 153 ft-lbs. Max Torque: 7500 rpm Drive Type: RWD Turning Circle: 35.4 ft. I think I'll get him sold on the 300zx has more room, 2+2's can recline the seats, 101 inch wheel base and the turning radious is the same as the S2000.
Follow Ups	Trying to convince Dad... - my_humble_300zx 14:38:34 08/30/04 is a honda s2k even as fast as a stock tt? (n/m) - Nadir(Detroit) 14:45:11 08/30/04 It's a pretty quick little rocket. - my_humble_300zx 14:56:25 08/30/04 S2000 is NA Z material - ZEngineer (TT) 15:00:14 08/30/04 My dad is interested in reliability not expense. - my_humble_300zx 15:43:05 08/30/04 Where did you get the idea that turbos go bad in 60K? (n/m) - Toso 15:45:44 08/30/04 When would you say they need to be replaced? - my_humble_300zx 15:59:33 08/30/04 When they fail. - Toso 16:20:14 08/30/04 depends how they were treated. (n/m) - Chris(NJ) 17:32:03 08/30/04 I've seen a bone stock one run 14.19 in the 1/4 (n/m) - boileralum 15:00:15 08/30/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.