Subject	actually i heard they were slower than the Z and supra!
Posted by	shawn300z on February 13, 2001 at 11:56 AM
	This message has been viewed 10 times.
In Reply To	Where did you get those stats? posted by J300z28 on February 13, 2001 at 11:45 AM
Message	but i am not sure. 3000gt's are heavy as hell and plus they are ugly as hell IMO. later
Follow Ups	VR4 is quicker to 60mph than z/supra/rx7 due to awd right? (n/m) - maverick (NYC) 11:38:49 02/13/01 i doubt it's quicker than a rx7 (n/m) - Suprman N/A Z 11:41:49 02/13/01 Where did you get those stats? - J300z28 11:45:52 02/13/01 actually i heard they were slower than the Z and supra! - shawn300z 11:56:38 02/13/01 I agree I've seen a VR4 run a 15.8 at the track - J300z28 12:06:05 02/13/01 just because you saw 15.8 at the track DOES NOT MEAN >> - maverick (NYC) 12:34:42 02/13/01 I know.............. - J300z28 12:53:19 02/13/01 I've seen one run 12's - - MikeeZ 12:37:00 02/13/01 if revved to 7 grand and dropped the clutch these cars... - Z06-KILLR 12:06:53 02/13/01 You don't "drop" the clutch in an AWD, you ride it out - Patrick [Buffalo] 13:55:54 02/13/01 Theres no way its faster than a Rex... - Icemann688 (TN) 12:16:38 02/13/01 way (n/m) - SactoTodd 12:26:20 02/13/01 Newer model VR4's to 60mph - 4.9 seconds!!! (n/m) - Jodecy 12:44:50 02/13/01 oh well... I guess that answers it then. RX-7 is about 5.1 - NIZZAN 13:06:12 02/13/01 Personal experience, no>>> - Kevin (Jax) 14:28:03 02/13/01 Might be true, but my 93VR4 didn't feel 1/2 as good as my Z - Zmoothie 16:56:49 02/13/01
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.