Subject	What are you getting at? (n/m)
Posted by	YugoBernie (NoVA) on August 04, 2004 at 11:48 AM
	This message has been viewed 37 times.
In Reply To	96 300 tt non vvt vs. 90-95 300zx tt posted by eroc77 on August 04, 2004 at 11:43 AM
Message
Follow Ups	96 300 tt non vvt vs. 90-95 300zx tt - eroc77 11:43:11 08/04/04 What are you getting at? (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 11:48:55 08/04/04 head-to-head 0-60/1/4 mi. same car! (n/m) - eroc77 11:55:00 08/04/04 dude...... (n/m) - titivillus37 11:55:55 08/04/04 come on seriously! (n/m) - eroc77 11:57:26 08/04/04 To prove what? (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 12:09:56 08/04/04 ok? - RobWR14 12:04:28 08/04/04 very true! thank you! - eroc77 12:09:50 08/04/04 valium (n/m) - Tennyson (ATL) 12:12:33 08/04/04 what's your question? - ni[X]it 12:11:31 08/04/04 early rx7s have a live rear axle, would that work? (n/m) - SactoTodd 12:31:17 08/04/04 can you help with something? - ni[X]it 12:49:31 08/04/04 Nic are you on a personal mission/crusade to be - AzHeat 15:39:21 08/04/04 Ouch (n/m) - Palehorse13 13:07:02 08/04/04 RX-7's weren't either... - FlawleZ 13:13:58 08/04/04 search for member - ZLover4Life 13:52:55 08/04/04 that answers all my questions, thanx. - eroc77 14:05:17 08/04/04 auto or manual? - ZLover4Life 15:13:52 08/04/04 JWT has had a 96TT ECU upgrade for over a year now. (n/m) - Goose93 14:26:07 08/04/04 "96TT Auto doesn't even have an ECU upgrade yet!" - ZLover4Life 14:36:13 08/04/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.