Subject	not necessarily (n/m)
Posted by	fourZero on June 30, 2004 at 8:37 PM
	This message has been viewed 58 times.
In Reply To	if you are reusing the existing pistons, rods, crank posted by ScubaSteve on June 30, 2004 at 04:07 PM
Message
Follow Ups	Engine Rebuild Time, UPGRADES?!?! - JonnyV300zTT 10:40:37 06/30/04 chrome it! :) (n/m) - takirb 10:42:51 06/30/04 www.Sgpracing.com (n/m) - mxsprocket1(TT motor?) 10:44:00 06/30/04 www.ebay.com - ZEngineer (TT) 10:46:50 06/30/04 oh! canadians... (n/m) - CAP927(Boston.) 11:11:55 06/30/04 Seriously, search engine rebuild first, because it has been - BigTDogg (MA) 10:49:54 06/30/04 it took me 3 months to choose my internal upgrade path. - nixit 10:50:41 06/30/04 I was just about to reply to your reply to bigdog - ScubaSteve 11:01:47 06/30/04 Never said my list was complete. Unfortunately, nick - BigTDogg (MA) 11:05:11 06/30/04 Balanced but to what degree? Ever heard of different - AzHeat 13:35:45 06/30/04 if you are reusing the existing pistons, rods, crank - ScubaSteve 16:07:46 06/30/04 balanced to Nissan stock standards . Which is not zero - AzHeat 16:38:19 06/30/04 I think you're wrong, no offense. Balanced is balanced. - ScubaSteve 17:35:49 06/30/04 You think all factory motors are zero balanced? Here is - AzHeat 17:53:57 06/30/04 Article on balancing. Every factory engine has its - AzHeat 18:10:11 06/30/04 not necessarily (n/m) - fourZero 20:37:34 06/30/04 3 months?? That explains everything. (n/m) - AzHeat 13:36:38 06/30/04 Even on your best day, you wont be an eighth as smart as me. - nixit 13:49:40 06/30/04 What about your best day? You're still a nerdy geeky - AzHeat 18:13:00 06/30/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.