Subject	The rear load would be much greater proportionately.
Posted by	Kenny on June 29, 2004 at 4:57 PM
	This message has been viewed 64 times.
In Reply To	One would think so.. What I am wondering about is the posted by Ash's Z (In Progress) on June 29, 2004 at 04:20 PM
Message	The front of the crank pulls 4 nylon belts. The rear pushes the driveline which in turn propels the vehicle forward. There is no question that the rear of the crank would have significantly more load. mkay? Kenny... PETZ Member #5 Datzun: You know, that goatse pic really isn't too bad.
Follow Ups	Interesting rod bearing wear pattern..... - Ash's Z (In Progress) 14:37:16 06/29/04 Macro mode. - YugoBernie (NoVA) 14:43:28 06/29/04 interesting indeed - spyhunter(nj) 14:44:40 06/29/04 pfttt what evidence? That's not a controlled test - AzHeat 14:55:06 06/29/04 I think he was joking.... (n/m) - ZEngineer (TT) 14:56:32 06/29/04 I hope so. (n/m) - Kenny 14:58:46 06/29/04 i heard you where banned.. what happened? (n/m) - Halo Z 15:06:37 06/29/04 They banned AssHeat by accident. Damn typos... (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 16:51:58 06/29/04 I banned yo Mama (n/m) - AzHeat 19:21:53 06/29/04 I remember 5th grade. Man, that was cool (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 19:57:53 06/29/04 5th grade was better the 2nd 2rd and 4th time :-) (n/m) - TARGETZ 21:04:19 06/29/04 DOh (n/m) - Halo Z 07:11:31 06/30/04 You won't find a controlled test environment. - Marshall 15:08:04 06/29/04 In other words it is just speculation and not proof. (n/m) - AzHeat 18:46:53 06/29/04 That's the best we'll get. - Marshall 02:50:28 06/30/04 Your suggestions dont fit the evidence though - - Ash's Z (In Progress) 15:13:03 06/29/04 I look at it this way- - Marshall 15:17:44 06/29/04 agreed (n/m) - aliaZ 15:23:34 06/29/04 Very logical reasoning, also what Ash is showing proves it - PLEAZURE in CA (SD) 15:28:12 06/29/04 the reason manufacturers dont use them is simple - ZEngineer (TT) 15:35:50 06/29/04 False (n/m) - aliaZ 16:18:00 06/29/04 please elaborate - ZEngineer (TT) 16:19:59 06/29/04 ok then :) - aliaZ 16:30:40 06/29/04 I disagree with this - Marshall 16:33:24 06/29/04 Way to jump to conclusions and make unwarranted assumptions - AzHeat 19:10:41 06/29/04 You can have obstruction in a main that feeds the rod - AzHeat 18:53:41 06/29/04 I've always had the concern and used to have a strong - Ash's Z (In Progress) 15:06:26 06/29/04 or maybe they weren't torqued down properly? (n/m) - ZEngineer (TT) 15:10:59 06/29/04 I wouldn't think so - I am meticulous with this part of the - Ash's Z (In Progress) 15:17:22 06/29/04 and when's the last time you calibrated that torque wrench? - ZEngineer (TT) 15:18:42 06/29/04 I thought you were a steal beam torque wrench fan? (n/m) - EricTTZ 15:27:24 06/29/04 What is the torque spec on the OEM rod bolt nut? I don't - AzHeat 19:20:19 06/29/04 quick question - Marshall 15:14:43 06/29/04 Good question, really. The OEM pulleys appear to be - Ash's Z (In Progress) 15:24:18 06/29/04 Re: Interesting rod bearing wear pattern..... - Renner 15:28:21 06/29/04 The rear cylinders also drive the frontal cylinders through - Ash's Z (In Progress) 15:46:56 06/29/04 Re: The rear cylinders also drive the frontal cylinders through - Renner 16:25:18 06/29/04 I don't know about this: - Marshall 16:49:05 06/29/04 Re: I don't know about this: - Renner 17:45:04 06/29/04 Good point - SeedyROM 19:29:51 06/29/04 Re: Re: Interesting rod bearing wear pattern..... - kuah@splparts.com 19:34:40 06/29/04 Re: Re: Re: Interesting rod bearing wear pattern..... - Renner 22:07:01 06/29/04 Re: Re: Re: Re: Interesting rod bearing wear pattern..... - kuah@splparts.com 23:28:12 06/29/04 Re: Interesting rod bearing wear pattern..... - Renner 07:50:29 06/30/04 Re: Re: Interesting rod bearing wear pattern..... - kuah@splparts.com 09:56:58 06/30/04 Re: Re: Re: Interesting rod bearing wear pattern..... - Renner 10:36:54 06/30/04 Re: Interesting rod bearing wear pattern..... - morepower2 15:29:41 06/29/04 I agree, thank you (n/m) - AzHeat 19:00:59 06/29/04 Hey Mike, you should hang out here more often! - AztecTT 01:02:51 06/30/04 Hmmm..... - Spongerider :) 15:37:36 06/29/04 Great link Dean! (n/m) - Ash's Z (In Progress) 16:11:54 06/29/04 This looks like the answer. - Kenny 16:53:06 06/29/04 Shouldn't it be more worn at the far end with Harmonics? - KaZ (VaBch) 15:58:02 06/29/04 One would think so.. What I am wondering about is the - Ash's Z (In Progress) 16:20:04 06/29/04 The rear load would be much greater proportionately. - Kenny 16:57:49 06/29/04 That's why the front twists more than the back - AzHeat 19:13:38 06/29/04 Hey Ash, build this: - Marshall 17:14:41 06/29/04 whoa (n/m) - Spee 18:30:46 06/29/04 holy damn - aliaZ 19:37:03 06/29/04 nothing like strapping on a potential bomb on your back. (n/m) - AzHeat 19:54:38 06/29/04 LOL (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 20:02:53 06/29/04 Re: One would think so.. What I am wondering about is the - morepower2 12:57:15 06/30/04 interesting quote: - Marshall 17:03:55 06/29/04 Re: interesting quote: - morepower2 12:59:07 06/30/04 stock pulleys are designed by the factory for longevity - Slowninja(Sport600 Inconel Z) 17:58:30 06/29/04 My Opinion...... - Greg D. (Specialty-Z) 18:32:26 06/29/04 Re: My Opinion...... - morepower2 13:01:20 06/30/04 Re: Interesting rod bearing wear pattern..... (n/m) - Z pearl 14:57:31 07/02/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.