|
"I kinda find it hard to believe that Vr-4 is faster than the Z because the VR-4's is atleast 100-200 pounds heavier" Actually its almost 300 lbs heavier "and the Z is has more HP at the rear than the 3000GT. " wrong there. even with awd the 3Kgt drivetrain is more efficient - this is based on real life figures from a dyno.
Stock 3Kgt put down 264 at the wheels same day and place when my Z TT put down 246 at the whels completely stock. BTW 94 + 3kgt had 320 hp vs the z 300 hp. Also after looking at the hp figures the z got max torque @ 3200 rpm whereas the 3k peaked at 2400 rpm (read better acceleration)
Also noticed that the 3k had more than 250 ltlbs of torque from 2400 rpm all the way to 5600 rpm wheras the Z had more than 250 ft lbs of torque between 3100 rpm and 3800 rpm. What this indicates is that the Z had a comparitively peakier power band than the 3k gt in this instance. Even the 3k is heavier it "should" be able to stay even with the Z atleast till 100 mph. "I always thought a stock TT could rock a stock Vr-4."
I think that depends on the driver. the awd's require to be launched hard and if done correctly should be able to stay ahead of the Z atleast till 100 mph.
 " If it dosn't make it faster, i don't care "
|
