Subject	I wouldn't doubt it either...stock 0-60 is mid 4 seconds. (n/m)
Posted by	RotaZ on March 24, 2004 at 12:56 PM
	This message has been viewed 24 times.
In Reply To	Is this BS? STi w/ 337WHP and 290 torque running 4sec 0-60 posted by Mikester(Seattle) on March 24, 2004 at 12:47 PM
Message
Follow Ups	Is this BS? STi w/ 337WHP and 290 torque running 4sec 0-60 - Mikester(Seattle) 12:47:03 03/24/04 sounds legit to me, a friend's STI with turboback runs - Scotts94z32 12:50:49 03/24/04 AWD does wonders to your 60' and 0-60 times. - boileralum 12:52:17 03/24/04 I think you have to grab 3rd to hit 60 in the STi (n/m) - Mikester(Seattle) 13:01:38 03/24/04 i dont doubt it. My buddy ran a 13.1 with jus a downpipe - mxsprocket1(TT motor?) 12:52:37 03/24/04 I wouldn't doubt it either...stock 0-60 is mid 4 seconds. (n/m) - RotaZ 12:56:18 03/24/04 Is a 4 sec 0-60 achievable in the Z? How much power needed? - Mikester(Seattle) 13:03:10 03/24/04 Power isn't the issue - traction is. - Kenny 13:07:34 03/24/04 arnel pulled somethin like 4.06 on his drag radials - Chris(NJ) 13:18:33 03/24/04 Suspension "flex" throws off the numbers... but still. - Kenny 13:22:08 03/24/04 275/40/17 Drag radials = 1.6 sec 60' is under 4 sec 0-60 (n/m) - Chip(GMS Racing) 13:18:03 03/24/04 4.30 w/slicks on my g-tech, and 4.52 on 275 street tires at - Scotts94z32 13:58:48 03/24/04 Re: Is this BS? STi w/ 337WHP and 290 torque running 4sec 0-60 - misippiZ (martyr?) 13:12:52 03/24/04 Re: Is this BS? STi w/ 337WHP and 290 torque running 4sec 0-60 - shaun1005 13:19:21 03/24/04 Have you seen this yourself? (n/m) - Kenny 13:47:03 03/24/04 unfortunately, not stock vs stock, my friend. (n/m) - Scotts94z32 13:59:32 03/24/04 Re: unfortunately, not stock vs stock, my friend. - shaun1005 18:40:17 03/24/04 no, these cars are like rockets 1st-3rd gear (n/m) - joel(PA) 14:29:22 03/24/04 ^^^I'd listen to him too, he onws one.^^^ (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 15:01:26 03/24/04 3 letters, can you figure out what they are? (n/m) - SR Productions ($65 stage 3) 18:49:49 03/24/04 Hmm, seems to be lots of response... VTF? ;-) (n/m) - Mikester(Seattle) 23:31:47 03/24/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.