Subject	v motors are also lower, not as tall, so weight is lower
Posted by	ScubaSteve on February 25, 2004 at 10:27 AM
	This message has been viewed 20 times.
In Reply To	Re: I don't think it's that the VQ is better posted by gt300 on February 25, 2004 at 12:44 AM
Message	designers are always trying to place motor as low as possible in sport cars for lower gravity. With lower weight, the car is not prone to sway as much. --.scubasteve.--
Follow Ups	"godzilla" is dead: nismo replaced skyline with Z in JGTC - gt300 21:42:25 02/24/04 What makes the VQ better for the track? (n/m) - T0M 22:30:50 02/24/04 I don't think it's that the VQ is better - 14yearZ 23:08:20 02/24/04 gt300 stated they were better for the track. (n/m) - T0M 23:32:54 02/24/04 Re: I don't think it's that the VQ is better - gt300 00:44:29 02/25/04 v motors are also lower, not as tall, so weight is lower - ScubaSteve 10:27:29 02/25/04 Al block may weigh less (n/m) - CarlCuro 23:44:58 02/24/04 racecars are engineered for (among other things) balance - OCD-Z 13:31:08 02/25/04 I thought the skylines were already running VQ30DETTs? - KaZ (VaBch) 22:32:54 02/24/04 Uhm...this is old news? - BooZTT (Hawaii) 00:32:47 02/25/04 yeah. they have used the VQs just about all of last year in - Halo Z 05:41:25 02/25/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.