Subject	The major issue isn't the upper plenum... but the lower
Posted by	Milo (Sport Z Magazine) on February 18, 2004 at 2:15 PM
	This message has been viewed 97 times.
In Reply To	any thoughts on the efficiency/ design of the intake plenum? (n/m) posted by OCD-Z on February 18, 2004 at 01:54 PM
Message	plenum in my opinion. the 90-93 designs were ok, but the '94 flow design owns (IMO). The upper plenum can be adjusted in diameter to accomodate some extra HP but with the angle of the bends it's still an "okay" design. A single intake with a fully ported lower plenum addition would be the most ideal.
Follow Ups	any thoughts on the efficiency/ design of the intake plenum? (n/m) - OCD-Z 13:54:46 02/18/04 I think it looks like interlaced fingers (n/m) - Spee 13:58:37 02/18/04 How romantic! - ZEngineer 14:17:21 02/18/04 heeheee too funny (n/m) - halik 14:29:21 02/18/04 lol (n/m) - rave 15:22:20 02/18/04 how many spiders have you seen... - Spee 16:50:44 02/18/04 thats funny how you say that i got a protype - SL103 14:13:57 02/18/04 can you at least use english next time you post? - nixit 14:20:23 02/18/04 2nd. stb? GTAW? wtf? (n/m) - Stealth021 14:21:41 02/18/04 Re: 2nd. stb? GTAW? wtf? - SL103 14:36:17 02/18/04 Re: Re: 2nd. stb? GTAW? wtf? - SL103 14:45:43 02/18/04 I think TIG is more understood. (n/m) - Scotts94z32 15:06:28 02/18/04 Awesome.. I'm waiting for someone to come up - whitepearlz 14:21:19 02/18/04 don't hold your breath here... - Spee 16:52:18 02/18/04 I was stating that in a general sense.. but looking at some - whitepearlz 17:02:54 02/18/04 GTAW is the process. not the machine. :CP (n/m) - T0M 22:42:30 02/18/04 The major issue isn't the upper plenum... but the lower - Milo (Sport Z Magazine) 14:15:28 02/18/04 Do you have any pictures illustrating the difference? - CarlCuro 15:20:51 02/18/04 The 90-93 lower plenum mixes the fuel into the air stream - Milo (Sport Z Magazine) 15:25:32 02/18/04 cool (n/m) - CarlCuro 15:27:34 02/18/04 Joel(PA) produced a concept version - EricTTZ 14:18:30 02/18/04 That's sweet. - CaptK(ATL) 14:29:52 02/18/04 Hmm.. - whitepearlz 14:32:07 02/18/04 >>> - joel(PA) 14:40:43 02/18/04 Thanks. (n/m) - whitepearlz 14:48:50 02/18/04 sweet - SL103 14:44:26 02/18/04 yeah, damn.... - joel(PA) 15:18:00 02/18/04 more>>> - joel(PA) 15:22:26 02/18/04 Awesome. (n/m) - SeedyROM (ZCON 2K4!) 15:33:08 02/18/04 smart mines think a like thats exactly what we were - SL103 16:40:50 02/18/04 "smart minds*" might think alike, not sure about mines (n/m) - silverZman 21:25:15 02/18/04 salty (n/m) - Jimina 15:09:04 02/18/04 Joel..I'm so there with you on this one. Please keep me... - BooZTT (Hawaii) 16:16:20 02/18/04 cool. did u modify your front end? (n/m) - joel(PA) 16:23:06 02/18/04 Depends on what you mean by that..lol! - BooZTT (Hawaii) 16:30:29 02/18/04 ohhh, i c now, in that angle u cant see the piece - joel(PA) 20:17:04 02/18/04 ohhhh DAMN!!!!!!!! SICK!!!!! This mean we will be able to >> - dusthis 17:04:45 02/18/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.