Subject	You woud be fine with either. Wire each sub in parellel,
Posted by	BigTDogg (MA) on February 04, 2004 at 1:47 PM
	This message has been viewed 22 times.
In Reply To	Car audio Gurus! What are your thoughts on these 2 amps? posted by 1tym on February 04, 2004 at 03:41 AM
Message	then relative to each other, in series. Or vice versa. Either way, you want the amp to "see" 4 ohms, not 1 ohm, because neither states safe operation for a 1 ohm load. "...Downpipes own. They own everything...anything...all there ever was and will be...they should be stock on all cars. Screw the environment, emissions, noise! I love them...I shall name my first-born after them with glee..." - SeedyRom 05:13:20 10/03/02 "Ricers are idiots" - RezidentEvil "i love the cock" - genic 22:20:47 09/25/03 "a hair brush does make a nice didlo, but it fixes your hair even better" -Nixit 6/2/2003
Follow Ups	Car audio Gurus! What are your thoughts on these 2 amps? - 1tym 03:41:57 02/04/04 go with the phoenix gold..its what i use. oh yeah. dont - X 2 Z 03:46:13 02/04/04 or splash the cash for the ti1200, or the tantrum 1200 (n/m) - dans300 09:37:12 02/04/04 i did not double post (n/m) - 1tym 13:20:38 02/04/04 Either one of those would be fine for two Alpine 10's (n/m) - Musashi Sword 08:09:22 02/04/04 Both are great. Let tell you something... - PiotrC70 09:51:08 02/04/04 One thing.. - BigTDogg (MA) 10:08:02 02/04/04 2nd love Boston Acoustics. Have 2 set of seperates that - Milo (Sport Z Magazine) 10:20:09 02/04/04 those be the ones... had a 12 before in my maxima w/ - PiotrC70 12:02:50 02/04/04 Those are good subs, but the Alpines are pretty damn clean - SeedyROM (ZCON 2K4!) 13:00:43 02/04/04 I gotz nutin 'gainst Alpines YO! - BigTDogg (MA) 13:28:25 02/04/04 I know :P (n/m) - SeedyROM (ZCON 2K4!) 13:35:35 02/04/04 Are the Sub 4ohm DVCs or the Special 2ohm DVCs? - oakleyguy(Rebuild Complete!!) 12:54:42 02/04/04 i just checked the box and its the 4OHM dvc (n/m) - 1tym 13:15:21 02/04/04 You woud be fine with either. Wire each sub in parellel, - BigTDogg (MA) 13:47:10 02/04/04 thanks (n/m) - 1tym 14:07:50 02/04/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.