Subject	Re: Too lean for me on the top end. And damn its laggin' bad.
Posted by	TTwomp on January 22, 2004 at 4:25 PM
	This message has been viewed 82 times.
In Reply To	Too lean for me on the top end. And damn its laggin' bad. posted by xybertron on January 21, 2004 at 06:52 PM
Message	Take a look at the chart.... The pull starts at 4400 rpm (it isn't a full pull). This car makes full boost much before what is presented here. How much boost is your car making cruising at 4400 rpm? Just trying to keep all the conjecture straight, Dan
Follow Ups	Scott Performance builds 600HP GT2530 Z "Little seats" >> - Scotts94z32 18:26:18 01/21/04 How did you custom tune the JWT ecu? The code is static. (n/m) - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 18:44:19 01/21/04 They run the car, gather data points and send back to - Zster (Big Red) 18:59:35 01/21/04 Not if you drive in it. It'll scare you sh*tless. :) (n/m) - Scotts94z32 12:39:49 01/22/04 For debating purposes, I would have loved to see 2.5" - PiotrC70 18:44:28 01/21/04 there would be no debate if it was 2.5" b/c there'd be no 3" - Scotts94z32 10:54:37 01/22/04 Very nice! The actual hp number is very close to mine - timz 18:47:38 01/21/04 Chin, you sell yours yet? (n/m) - RegalZ 20:42:40 01/21/04 Hey, got any turbos laying around? - Jackie 20:46:40 01/21/04 Too lean for me on the top end. And damn its laggin' bad. - xybertron 18:52:53 01/21/04 I think they changed the A/R ratios on the turbo, so - Zster (Big Red) 19:01:33 01/21/04 .84 housing would make sense. - Chip(GMS Racing) 21:00:52 01/21/04 it is the stock .64 housing, actually. (n/m) - Scotts94z32 10:50:50 01/22/04 yeah, it doesn't look like they hit the gas early enough... - Bernie (OOParts International) 20:15:39 01/21/04 Re: Too lean for me on the top end. And damn its laggin' bad. - TTwomp 16:25:21 01/22/04 I'd like to see a full pull! - Zster (Big Red) 17:04:24 01/22/04 Yes, the blue/yellow car has the other housings, this car - Scotts94z32 17:06:23 01/22/04 I love yellow cars, green ones too... - Scotts94z32 17:07:26 01/22/04 Ok, I want to instruct for that guy! ;) (n/m) - FLYT300 18:53:40 01/21/04 lmao - CaptanZap 23:08:34 01/21/04 Re: lmao - FLYT300 14:03:46 01/22/04 I'm having a problem, will you come see me? (n/m) - Scotts94z32 14:36:17 01/22/04 Yea sure. What's the name of that institution your're in? - FLYT300 15:30:50 01/22/04 you're always planning ahead... - Scotts94z32 17:28:19 01/22/04 I've been in that car and let me tell you... - Red300ztt96 19:32:17 01/21/04 well ya gotta to live here in the bay area =c) (n/m) - CaptanZap 23:15:09 01/21/04 nice. do u happen to have the corrected numbers? (n/m) - Bernie (OOParts International) 20:16:24 01/21/04 Something screwy there, seems way too laggy to me (n/m) - RegalZ 20:37:05 01/21/04 Re: Something screwy there, seems way too laggy to me - Russell@Z1 08:46:07 01/22/04 that's a tad lean (n/m) - Seb 21:10:48 01/21/04 We agree, but think their wideband 02 is off. (n/m) - Scotts94z32 23:19:30 01/21/04 weak Scott....my NA produced higher numbers! - CaptanZap 23:06:54 01/21/04 You have until March! (n/m) - Scotts94z32 23:19:08 01/21/04 duty cycle on the injectors? - aliaZ 23:46:27 01/21/04 Will you post/email me the 91 oct graph. - Woody75 (Denver) 08:44:46 01/22/04 Yes, I'll get it to you later today (n/m) - Scotts94z32 10:53:16 01/22/04 Re: Scott Performance builds 600HP GT2530 Z "Little seats" >> - Magnum 17:34:22 01/22/04 stock (n/m) - Scotts94z32 17:50:22 01/22/04 Here is the dyno on low settings>>> - Scotts94z32 12:25:09 01/23/04 that's 457.5HP and 396.0 SAE #'s, BTW. (n/m) - Scotts94z32 12:46:43 01/23/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.