Subject	it is the stock .64 housing, actually. (n/m)
Posted by	Scotts94z32 on January 22, 2004 at 10:50 AM
	This message has been viewed 65 times.
In Reply To	.84 housing would make sense. posted by Chip(GMS Racing) on January 21, 2004 at 09:00 PM
Message
Follow Ups	Scott Performance builds 600HP GT2530 Z "Little seats" >> - Scotts94z32 18:26:18 01/21/04 How did you custom tune the JWT ecu? The code is static. (n/m) - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 18:44:19 01/21/04 They run the car, gather data points and send back to - Zster (Big Red) 18:59:35 01/21/04 Not if you drive in it. It'll scare you sh*tless. :) (n/m) - Scotts94z32 12:39:49 01/22/04 For debating purposes, I would have loved to see 2.5" - PiotrC70 18:44:28 01/21/04 there would be no debate if it was 2.5" b/c there'd be no 3" - Scotts94z32 10:54:37 01/22/04 Very nice! The actual hp number is very close to mine - timz 18:47:38 01/21/04 Chin, you sell yours yet? (n/m) - RegalZ 20:42:40 01/21/04 Hey, got any turbos laying around? - Jackie 20:46:40 01/21/04 Too lean for me on the top end. And damn its laggin' bad. - xybertron 18:52:53 01/21/04 I think they changed the A/R ratios on the turbo, so - Zster (Big Red) 19:01:33 01/21/04 .84 housing would make sense. - Chip(GMS Racing) 21:00:52 01/21/04 it is the stock .64 housing, actually. (n/m) - Scotts94z32 10:50:50 01/22/04 yeah, it doesn't look like they hit the gas early enough... - Bernie (OOParts International) 20:15:39 01/21/04 Re: Too lean for me on the top end. And damn its laggin' bad. - TTwomp 16:25:21 01/22/04 I'd like to see a full pull! - Zster (Big Red) 17:04:24 01/22/04 Yes, the blue/yellow car has the other housings, this car - Scotts94z32 17:06:23 01/22/04 I love yellow cars, green ones too... - Scotts94z32 17:07:26 01/22/04 Ok, I want to instruct for that guy! ;) (n/m) - FLYT300 18:53:40 01/21/04 lmao - CaptanZap 23:08:34 01/21/04 Re: lmao - FLYT300 14:03:46 01/22/04 I'm having a problem, will you come see me? (n/m) - Scotts94z32 14:36:17 01/22/04 Yea sure. What's the name of that institution your're in? - FLYT300 15:30:50 01/22/04 you're always planning ahead... - Scotts94z32 17:28:19 01/22/04 I've been in that car and let me tell you... - Red300ztt96 19:32:17 01/21/04 well ya gotta to live here in the bay area =c) (n/m) - CaptanZap 23:15:09 01/21/04 nice. do u happen to have the corrected numbers? (n/m) - Bernie (OOParts International) 20:16:24 01/21/04 Something screwy there, seems way too laggy to me (n/m) - RegalZ 20:37:05 01/21/04 Re: Something screwy there, seems way too laggy to me - Russell@Z1 08:46:07 01/22/04 that's a tad lean (n/m) - Seb 21:10:48 01/21/04 We agree, but think their wideband 02 is off. (n/m) - Scotts94z32 23:19:30 01/21/04 weak Scott....my NA produced higher numbers! - CaptanZap 23:06:54 01/21/04 You have until March! (n/m) - Scotts94z32 23:19:08 01/21/04 duty cycle on the injectors? - aliaZ 23:46:27 01/21/04 Will you post/email me the 91 oct graph. - Woody75 (Denver) 08:44:46 01/22/04 Yes, I'll get it to you later today (n/m) - Scotts94z32 10:53:16 01/22/04 Re: Scott Performance builds 600HP GT2530 Z "Little seats" >> - Magnum 17:34:22 01/22/04 stock (n/m) - Scotts94z32 17:50:22 01/22/04 Here is the dyno on low settings>>> - Scotts94z32 12:25:09 01/23/04 that's 457.5HP and 396.0 SAE #'s, BTW. (n/m) - Scotts94z32 12:46:43 01/23/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.