Subject	Probably a combination of the wing and a weak engine...
Posted by	Snoguitar on January 20, 2004 at 3:07 PM
	This message has been viewed 67 times.
In Reply To	so the drag from my wing overpowers a stock NA's power posted by takirb on January 20, 2004 at 02:56 PM
Message	I did notice that my old roommates '95TT seemed less stable than my NA at highspeeds. He said that he notices the same compared to his '93TT. The wing was our guess, *shrug*. This the post you are looking for? [ http://www.twinturbo.net/net/viewmsg.aspx?forum=technical&msg_id=749893 ] wannabe genic sig:
Follow Ups	anyone know top speed for a n/a with ashspec ecu? (n/m) - joez3292 12:52:12 01/20/04 depends on your mods and I doubt you will redline it in - JC_NS 12:55:48 01/20/04 Once you put in any aftermarket ECU that removes the - YugoBernie (NoVA) 12:55:53 01/20/04 I thought NA's did not have a limiter. (n/m) - JC_NS 13:06:00 01/20/04 speed limiter is 121mph on stock ECU... tried it.. :) - takirb 13:18:12 01/20/04 wrong (n/m) - Snoguitar 14:28:19 01/20/04 well, that's what i found researching it. as soon as it'd - takirb 14:33:38 01/20/04 120 is about the rev-limiter in 4th gear >> - my91z 14:36:38 01/20/04 it is possible, but not likely. the on/off bouncing was what - takirb 14:45:24 01/20/04 researching? In the six years that I've been here... - Snoguitar 14:39:41 01/20/04 ok, i stand corrected. the stock ECU allows a higher top - takirb 14:50:26 01/20/04 No enough power to overcome drag (n/m) - Snoguitar 14:53:18 01/20/04 so the drag from my wing overpowers a stock NA's power - takirb 14:56:56 01/20/04 Probably a combination of the wing and a weak engine... - Snoguitar 15:07:19 01/20/04 good searching lol but nah, that was the speed sensor - takirb 15:14:28 01/20/04 negative...its not the wing - cant_z_me(retired) 17:09:54 01/20/04 Never said it was unstable. (n/m) - Snoguitar 17:43:54 01/20/04 it wasn't unstable at all. scary at 430am on a back road - takirb 22:34:55 01/20/04 Nope, something wrong with your car. >> - my91z 14:31:18 01/20/04 Speed limiter value. - DVDBURN (MD) 19:47:49 01/20/04 N/A cant reach top speed in under 2 minutes so its pointless (n/m) - Stealth021 12:56:01 01/20/04 sounds like a scienctificalllaayallally test was ran? - genic 13:00:17 01/20/04 why so?? (n/m) - takirb 13:18:36 01/20/04 1/4 in 15sec @ 94mph ( 149mph - 94 = 55 )( 120sec-15 = 105 ) (n/m) - ZBlacktt 13:37:05 01/20/04 you don't have a z. (n/m) - JuicycJ4(doesntlikealbinodirt) 09:41:28 01/21/04 ECU no longer has speed limiter that would affect it. - Kenny 12:56:22 01/20/04 Last night coming back from houston I hit 147 in my n/a - HelloStirFry77 12:58:03 01/20/04 sweet (n/m) - joez3292 12:59:23 01/20/04 *stupid (n/m) - Kenny 13:21:34 01/20/04 **Darwinesque (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 14:37:57 01/20/04 a word? (n/m) - HelloStirFry77 23:54:16 01/20/04 neutral on a slight slope downhill?? (n/m) - takirb 14:06:24 01/20/04 Ok, this place is being taken over by ASH,, lol - ZBlacktt 13:07:40 01/20/04 "coz rocks"...... better?? :P lol (n/m) - takirb 13:19:59 01/20/04 sheep (n/m) - genic 13:21:48 01/20/04 No doubt - SeedyROM (ZCON 2K4!) 15:30:23 01/20/04 Yeah, brings up the whole quality vs. quantity question :/ (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 15:38:05 01/20/04 Ash may know, but that's a stretch. :) (n/m) - Milo (Sport Z Magazine) 13:55:31 01/20/04 The limiter is set to 315MPH. If you get going that fast, - AshsZ 14:17:48 01/20/04 Do the math-Its a physics eq. coef frict.=0.31, etc, etc,etc (n/m) - KLRBIRD 14:28:25 01/20/04 Sorry- coefficient of Drag I'll see if i can post it tonight (n/m) - KLRBIRD 14:34:16 01/20/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.