Subject	Oh and I had 123k on it with NO problems. (n/m)
Posted by	bigzfan on January 19, 2004 at 9:30 PM
	This message has been viewed 52 times.
In Reply To	NZR: for guys with 240sx's - what does your odometer read? posted by clazzic on January 19, 2004 at 09:18 PM
Message
Follow Ups	NZR: for guys with 240sx's - what does your odometer read? - clazzic 21:18:35 01/19/04 I beleive the 240's have a timing chain so thats - bigzfan 21:27:55 01/19/04 Define "decent $"... also.. - xxbulovax91xx 21:30:32 01/19/04 Oh and I had 123k on it with NO problems. (n/m) - bigzfan 21:30:32 01/19/04 I had 140k on mine with no problems (n/m) - BigD 21:36:24 01/19/04 134k on a 1989 SOHC, runs great, timing chain rattle (n/m) - silverZed 21:38:50 01/19/04 197k on my 91 240sx - aliaZ 22:05:06 01/19/04 track car :) (n/m) - Guapo 23:00:24 01/19/04 yep :) (n/m) - aliaZ 09:32:32 01/20/04 156k on an 1989 SOHC with no problems - sfpearl300z 22:59:04 01/19/04 Got my 91 with 180,000 for $1,000 out the door - outkaZTT 23:37:04 01/19/04 1990 with 179K that I got for free but not running. (n/m) - Glenn (San Jose) 01:19:53 01/20/04 yeah but u made a beast out of it... - JokerF_15 01:58:43 01/20/04 why not get a turbo Z31 for a beater? Just wondering as - ENVYMYZ 02:17:11 01/20/04 240 is more reliable with more potential. (n/m) - Rob.M @ Downshift Magazine 07:45:21 01/20/04 Z31s are HORRIBLE cars... - KaZ (VaBch) 08:06:30 01/20/04 Re: Z31s are HORRIBLE cars... - rich@splparts.com 09:06:13 01/20/04 2nd (n/m) - junxster 09:43:41 01/20/04 Ok ok, worst 300zx ever... - KaZ (VaBch) 10:39:32 01/20/04 My S-13 has 182K on it now. >>> - Rob.M @ Downshift Magazine 07:44:21 01/20/04 101K dont worry, replacement KA's are so cheap you can't - NSANY(ATL) 07:57:45 01/20/04 s-l-o-w... - sciamop 09:21:20 01/20/04 i had a 93 altima with the KA and busted my chain @ 130k (n/m) - junxster 09:41:36 01/20/04 1989 240sx w/ 165k miles runs great - s3trios 10:11:33 01/20/04 thanks for the very informative responses (n/m) - clazzic 10:58:58 01/20/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.