Subject	VS. NA, not turbo VS turbo on the same SAE scale.
Posted by	colocomp (Denver) on January 18, 2004 at 6:13 PM
	This message has been viewed 155 times.
In Reply To	No the correction for turbo cars is about 3-6 percent posted by MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) on January 18, 2004 at 06:06 PM
Message	you really don't understand do you. We have more power at altitude than our NA buddies I agree. I don't know why you cant understand? Because the correction factor is so high there is more margin for error, hence the 1 to 2% VS. other turbo cars on a dyno jet using the SAE correction.
Follow Ups	New PE1420 Numbers and lots O pics. - colocomp (Denver) 15:38:06 01/18/04 Nice pics. No dyno charts? (n/m) - JC (Vegas) 15:44:01 01/18/04 I am sure Tim will post them later. - colocomp (Denver) 15:45:53 01/18/04 Okay. Thanks. (n/m) - JC (Vegas) 15:48:44 01/18/04 Nice Cars. Is that corrected HP for Denver or actual - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 15:57:22 01/18/04 SAE Corrected (n/m) - colocomp (Denver) 16:00:49 01/18/04 Re: SAE Corrected for NA cars. (n/m) - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 16:01:56 01/18/04 But NA cars are still affected by altitude? (n/m) - gtclk 16:06:28 01/18/04 not like turbo cars. The dyno numbers are for turbo - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 16:08:42 01/18/04 Don't even bother discussing anything with MikeH... - nixit 16:11:33 01/18/04 Shows how much smarts you know when it comes - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 16:14:08 01/18/04 No one disputes that........ (n/m) - colocomp (Denver) 16:18:05 01/18/04 It's not nearly that simple. - Marshall 23:49:39 01/18/04 Mike it's all we got, the air is thinner here deal with it - colocomp (Denver) 16:08:59 01/18/04 Does the dyno operator put a setting in the computer - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 16:10:31 01/18/04 NO.. he does not do it at 3000 ft dyno locations either. (n/m) - colocomp (Denver) 16:12:33 01/18/04 What does 3000 ft have do with it? (n/m) - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 16:14:49 01/18/04 Lower Dynojet locations use SAE corrections as well - colocomp (Denver) 16:17:00 01/18/04 WOW... you are truelly remarkable. - nixit 16:23:51 01/18/04 read this link from sport compact cars when it talks - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 16:30:38 01/18/04 You're reading my post but not understanding... - colocomp (Denver) 16:43:50 01/18/04 I understand but most everyone does not live in - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 16:49:51 01/18/04 It is all we have, I now have seen Z dynos at - colocomp (Denver) 16:58:11 01/18/04 The 14% is too high for turbo cars. That standard is - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 17:23:58 01/18/04 We all have an advantage over NA cars - colocomp (Denver) 17:29:20 01/18/04 "Stage 3 Z's 320 to 340 rwhp 14 to 15 PSI" is HIGH -> - Z-Jay (Edmonton, AB) 17:10:36 01/18/04 I have seen poor running stage 3's dyno @ to 280 to - colocomp (Denver) 17:23:18 01/18/04 But you're in Denver too right? What seems normal to you - Z-Jay (Edmonton, AB) 17:53:40 01/18/04 There are so many variables that one could take into - colocomp (Denver) 18:05:20 01/18/04 The further you are away from sea level, the less VALID the - Z-Jay (Edmonton, AB) 23:56:17 01/18/04 Turbos have an advantage at lower elevations - colocomp (Denver) 07:41:08 01/19/04 Re: New PE1420 Numbers and lots O pics. - Magnum 16:05:46 01/18/04 I think the spiking might have peak those numbers. (n/m) - colocomp (Denver) 16:11:34 01/18/04 I'm not claiming anything but who gave you that 1420 info? (n/m) - Woody75 (Denver) 20:31:50 01/18/04 thats just gonna be wrong! nobody has even done max - Gsujeff55 11:46:04 01/19/04 Re: New PE1420 Numbers and lots O pics. - frozenguy 16:07:12 01/18/04 I have some more, I love the big downforce tail. (n/m) - colocomp (Denver) 16:15:26 01/18/04 great pics! (n/m) - Spee 16:14:32 01/18/04 Nice numbers. - Thrash 16:37:35 01/18/04 I think everyone should dyno at the beach. - nixit 16:39:34 01/18/04 I agree, if we are off it is only 1 to 2% - colocomp (Denver) 16:47:03 01/18/04 I've seen dyno corrections for denver around 20% - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 16:56:28 01/18/04 Knucklehead - colocomp (Denver) 17:00:32 01/18/04 are you disputing that? I have seen dyno charts that - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 17:19:20 01/18/04 No, you still can't comprehend... - colocomp (Denver) 17:25:37 01/18/04 No the correction for turbo cars is about 3-6 percent - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 18:06:27 01/18/04 VS. NA, not turbo VS turbo on the same SAE scale. - colocomp (Denver) 18:13:50 01/18/04 Look at this site, and plug in the numbers it is more - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 18:50:58 01/18/04 Mike get over the NA thing, I am trying to - colocomp (Denver) 19:18:29 01/18/04 Cool Site - I wouldve gained 12 hp if I did the correction - Thrash 19:49:18 01/18/04 Very nice numbers! - Chip(GMS Racing) 17:20:42 01/18/04 Nice numbers... can't wait for the chart. - degradated 19:47:03 01/18/04 I can't get more that 24.9 PSI max on stock ported manis (n/m) - Thrash 19:50:53 01/18/04 That's still not bad... - degradated 19:56:29 01/18/04 REad my post below and you'll see why I didn't use race gas. (n/m) - Woody75 (Denver) 20:28:53 01/18/04 This is exactly why I wasn't going to post THIS dyno session - Woody75 (Denver) 20:27:50 01/18/04 I for one almost have a tear in my eye... - ni[X]it 10:14:37 01/19/04 Awesome numbers...great job!!! (n/m) - mr. zed line 16:06:20 01/19/04 Awesome pics .. all the Zs look flawlez - PLEAZURE in CA (SD) 20:55:02 01/18/04 lol, I have that wideband shown in the viper... - KaZ (VaBch) 21:36:42 01/18/04 Wow! Very nice. (n/m) - DVDBURN (MD) 22:09:43 01/18/04 Re: New PE1420 Numbers and lots O pics. - SR Productions (C5 Bound) 22:51:49 01/18/04 nice! what kind of numbers did the porsches put down. (n/m) - Chris(NJ) 09:07:35 01/19/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.