Subject	Ft*lb, and Lb*ft are interchangeable, because they are
Posted by	BigTDogg (MA) on January 12, 2004 at 10:45 AM
	This message has been viewed 20 times.
In Reply To	If you want to get real technical it is in "lb-ft" posted by SooperZ95 on January 12, 2004 at 09:47 AM
Message	Multiplied. Any more analysis into that is deemed useless by me. "...Downpipes own. They own everything...anything...all there ever was and will be...they should be stock on all cars. Screw the environment, emissions, noise! I love them...I shall name my first-born after them with glee..." - SeedyRom 05:13:20 10/03/02 "Ricers are idiots" - RezidentEvil "i love the cock" - genic 22:20:47 09/25/03 "a hair brush does make a nice didlo, but it fixes your hair even better" -Nixit 6/2/2003
Follow Ups	ft/lbs - skaterltj69 09:04:14 01/12/04 Torque is measured in ft*lbs, not ft/lbs (n/m) - therinL 09:12:34 01/12/04 If you want to get real technical it is in "lb-ft" - SooperZ95 09:47:17 01/12/04 Ft*lb, and Lb*ft are interchangeable, because they are - BigTDogg (MA) 10:45:10 01/12/04 No, they actually aren't interchangable for references sake. - SooperZ95 10:50:31 01/12/04 brilliant! (n/m) - Z_PREPared 11:30:03 01/12/04 Eh, I reluctantly conceed. Retarded Brits, figures. (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 11:47:11 01/12/04 funny too because the FSM uses the incorrect ft-lb unit (n/m) - Z_PREPared 01:47:20 01/13/04 Communicative axiom? x*y = y*x? duh? - therinL 10:53:20 01/12/04 There's a bit more to it than that: - SooperZ95 11:08:05 01/12/04 Understood. Thanks =) (n/m) - therinL 15:30:17 01/12/04 it's in your factory service manual... - ni[X]it 09:22:15 01/12/04 I *think* it was 12-15, but I'm not positive. Like Nixit - whitepearlz 09:48:16 01/12/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.