TwinTurbo.NET: Nissan 300ZX forum - No no, the statement isn't meant that way at all
People Seeking Info
 
   


     
Subject No no, the statement isn't meant that way at all
     
Posted by SeedyROM (ZCON 2K4!) on December 26, 2003 at 4:18 AM
  This message has been viewed 58 times.
     
In Reply To I would have no reason to post a fake dyno... posted by ZisLuv on December 26, 2003 at 04:03 AM
     
Message What I meant was that one has to set aside all the logic and math that goes into things and based on a one-sided comparision dyno be convinced that the difference isn't a big deal. Sure, it wasn't said in so many words, but that's how it read to me when I first opened it up. And hey, that's your feeling...nothing wrong with it.

To make things simple and so we didn't even need to fight over all that "back to back dyno" testing garbage, I stated that even if all of your feelings on the issue (based on dyno and seat of the pants) are 100% accurate, it kinda didn't matter. The reason being that the consensus seems to be that FMICs are an unnecessary mod on stock turbos rather than a terribly hurtful ones. And it has always seemed that the data backed that up. If people wanted to justify the money being worth the looks factor, that's another tale.

Sorry for the confusion! I'm not clear when I can't sleep :)


My 300Zs: www.zheaven.com - Have a question about either of my 300ZXs? Answers lie within.
Admin: www.350ZForum.com - Your source for the lastest info on the new Nissan 350Z!
Writer: www.SportZMagazine.com - Nothing but Z cars from cover to cover! Subscribe today!
Moderator: www.TwinTurbo.net - Hands down, the best site for 90-96 Z car info and discussion!

     
Follow Ups  
     
Post a
Followup

You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.