Subject	that's cuz its's as good if not better than the mustang unit
Posted by	Halo Z on December 09, 2003 at 6:51 PM
	This message has been viewed 54 times.
In Reply To	At the bottom of the PDF they don't list the 90-96 Z32 in posted by M[ohio] on December 09, 2003 at 06:48 PM
Message	it's fairly common for the 240 guys to use them in swaps and turbo ka set ups. ________________________________________________________ RIC, my spelling sux, deal with it. max hp 207.4 max torque 188.7
Follow Ups	Anyone checked out JWT's website lately? - DVDBURN (MD) 17:30:57 12/09/03 about time they updated it (n/m) - Zeus 17:33:15 12/09/03 2nd, been 7 years at least. But nothing new for the Z32 - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 17:34:29 12/09/03 Check out all the PDF files in the support section. - DVDBURN (MD) 17:37:03 12/09/03 Holy wow. Did you notice it still says test index. (n/m) - Goose93 17:50:51 12/09/03 Re: Anyone checked out JWT's website lately? - rich@splparts.com 17:54:10 12/09/03 lol, BTW I've been meaning to contact you but keep - DVDBURN (MD) 18:05:00 12/09/03 Re: lol, BTW I've been meaning to contact you but keep - rich@splparts.com 19:31:13 12/09/03 Weird, the first time you posted this and then deleted it - inf 18:11:35 12/09/03 Sorry, I was messing with my sigs. (n/m) - DVDBURN (MD) 18:27:17 12/09/03 hey guys,has somebody done the adaptation of a mustang - kabubi13(Tx) 18:28:23 12/09/03 Re: hey guys,has somebody done the adaptation of a mustang - Spee 22:23:10 12/09/03 interesting - Dallas DamonZ 18:38:04 12/09/03 At the bottom of the PDF they don't list the 90-96 Z32 in - M[ohio] 18:48:14 12/09/03 that's cuz its's as good if not better than the mustang unit - Halo Z 18:51:31 12/09/03 yep. that was my point. (n/m) - M[ohio] 19:02:46 12/09/03 Re: At the bottom of the PDF they don't list the 90-96 Z32 in - rich@splparts.com 18:52:00 12/09/03 SAD they still wants 595 for there ECU! (n/m) - TARGETZ 20:10:13 12/09/03 hurts my eyes to be honest...... (n/m) - felixx23 (DFW) 21:12:04 12/09/03 2nd. It almost creates a 3D effect. (n/m) - Dave N 21:46:36 12/09/03 ugly and poorly designed (n/m) - TagZ 15:55:20 12/10/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.