Subject	Maybe this statement is more applicable to NAs (n/m)
Posted by	shirow on October 24, 2003 at 10:57 AM
	This message has been viewed 20 times.
In Reply To	The difference between exhaust systems is insignificant. posted by JRH(KY) on October 24, 2003 at 09:36 AM
Message
Follow Ups	looking for dyno tests for all the dif. exhausts - JDMz32smity 09:27:07 10/24/03 The difference between exhaust systems is insignificant. - JRH(KY) 09:36:39 10/24/03 2nd. (n/m) - Kenny 14 psi 09:37:34 10/24/03 3rd - NR98 (next year) 09:42:23 10/24/03 Here is a link to proof that there is a bigger difference... - Specialty-Z 10:16:18 10/24/03 nice pic on sig. (n/m) - OCD-Z 10:23:51 10/24/03 I stand corrected. WOW. (n/m) - Kenny 14 psi 10:27:03 10/24/03 So what you're saying is that at JDMz32smity's level of tune - JRH(KY) 10:37:23 10/24/03 Yeah, with just a pop it wont be as drastic but at - SeedyROM 11:00:44 10/24/03 Yep, and that's not the only example too :) - SeedyROM 10:40:20 10/24/03 Maybe this statement is more applicable to NAs (n/m) - shirow 10:57:24 10/24/03 on an NA even 'a little' hp is significant - Janders 16:49:25 10/24/03 Re: The difference between exhaust systems is insignificant. - ZHOUND 11:38:54 10/24/03 Re: Re: The difference between exhaust systems is insignificant. - JRH(KY) 11:44:11 10/24/03 there was a dyno of a hiper making 15 more than a B & B - Janders 16:52:02 10/24/03 thank you for all your imput yes i only have the pop now - JDMz32smity 11:39:35 10/24/03 13-15hp = insignificant? (n/m) - Janders 16:45:36 10/24/03 Still want the NA rims? Email yo.. (n/m) - Maximamike 11:07:36 10/24/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.