Subject	Future dynos can include that but..
Posted by	kryptonite729 on October 05, 2003 at 9:49 PM
	This message has been viewed 77 times.
In Reply To	Intersting. but in the future posted by Russell@Z1 on October 05, 2003 at 07:08 PM
Message	One that was noticed on the Ashspec using the other cars was that the ECU was very lean until later rpms. It wasn't until the 4500-5500rpm area that the ASHspec came into the 11.5 area that you are trying to achieve, correct? I'm not the rocket scientist with the chips like others but i was there during the dyno session and witness the comparison and IMO it was a very fair comparison but 3 pulls on each ECU would be able to avg on overall better product. One thing on that point that concerns me is that people are complaining of heat soak but wouldn't 3 pulls on each ecu (9 total) lead to the final chip becoming the worst thing. Doing the 1 pull per ECU method the car manage the same temperature throughout.
Follow Ups	ECU Dyno Comparison at Boost Solutions - kryptonite729 13:25:53 10/05/03 Yeah, for a stage 3 car, these were some great numbers!!! - George(boost-solutions.com) 13:34:42 10/05/03 Can I see the dyno chart? - Stealth021 13:35:19 10/05/03 The guys at Balanced will email us the dyno charts on >>> - George(boost-solutions.com) 13:46:35 10/05/03 Excellent, Now Im curious if your chip can... - Stealth021 15:27:21 10/05/03 ECU can't really reduce lag - ZLover4Life 17:06:42 10/05/03 actually they can.. - zads 19:30:33 10/05/03 Something tells me that is someone else was to do the - ibpimpn 13:39:49 10/05/03 Well, we did the runs immediately one after the other. - George(boost-solutions.com) 13:48:35 10/05/03 one pass or three passes each? (n/m) - ni[X]it 13:51:03 10/05/03 1 pass on each ECU (n/m) - kryptonite729 14:37:42 10/05/03 Bummer. Pointless thread then. (n/m) - ni[X]it 15:12:01 10/05/03 2nd.......... (n/m) - Kyle(Houston) 17:53:04 10/05/03 3rd...They should have taken a much more controlled and - therinL 20:31:51 10/05/03 Very few scientists on this board, - Chip(GMS Racing) 19:41:23 10/05/03 2nd (n/m) - aliaZ 22:40:40 10/05/03 Hi. ALl I am saying, - nixit 09:55:48 10/06/03 I am with you. (n/m) - Chip(GMS Racing) 11:45:12 10/06/03 Agreed, its just a start - kryptonite729 14:28:10 10/06/03 No movie necessary. I just think there was an advantage - ibpimpn 13:57:06 10/05/03 The car came in hot off the streets so it was hot, but... - Stealth021 15:31:00 10/05/03 Doesn't the ECU have to "learn" some parameters for the car? - olyar15 14:04:57 10/05/03 No, Ash learned it most of them. :) (n/m) - BooZted 16:01:46 10/05/03 engrish (n/m) - fourZero 16:08:40 10/05/03 hmmm....interesting (n/m) - NR98 (next year) 13:59:38 10/05/03 Looking forward to the new chip... (n/m) - SooperZ95 14:12:28 10/05/03 Good to see that yall are actually dyno testing everything - JonnyZ (DC) 14:49:10 10/05/03 Re: ECU Dyno Comparison at Boost Solutions - MyWhiteZTT(NJ) 14:53:04 10/05/03 Interesting results... - AshsZ 15:02:34 10/05/03 who pioneered the boost solutions ecu? (n/m) - cant_z_me(retired) 15:05:10 10/05/03 car would be heat soaked by the 3rd chip - TARGETZ 15:27:58 10/05/03 I totally agree, esp. in light of the torque numbers. - J-Z91(OH) 17:06:11 10/05/03 big 3rd!!!! (n/m) - dilly yo 11:04:02 10/06/03 I'm no expert by any stretch but they all seem relitively... - creamofthecrop7 16:04:22 10/05/03 devin makes your eproms right? (n/m) - Timmy! 16:14:43 10/05/03 Intersting. but in the future - Russell@Z1 19:08:36 10/05/03 Future dynos can include that but.. - kryptonite729 21:49:56 10/05/03 We appeciate you ripping us off for that chip. - Russell@Z1 09:39:48 10/06/03 Well, these were the intial runs. Next week we are tuning - George(boost-solutions.com) 11:25:47 10/06/03 Blah! One sided stories suck - kryptonite729 13:24:01 10/06/03 I find this odd...Important information about the topic: - therinL 20:50:22 10/05/03 The car was a stage 5 car, and the AFR was a very rich - George(boost-solutions.com) 11:16:53 10/06/03 A little more on the dyno since some are skeptical - kryptonite729 21:43:04 10/05/03 You should have quit while you were ahead :/ (n/m) - ibpimpn 22:24:20 10/05/03 I think you should have conducted a more controlled test. - Marshall 23:07:30 10/05/03 OK, now this is great. You told us that your eprom had gone - John@Z1 09:41:01 10/06/03 Let me fully explain this then - kryptonite729 11:01:26 10/06/03 John, wanted to see what all REGULAR chips will do. Stay - George(boost-solutions.com) 11:23:10 10/06/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.