why? (n/m) posted by fourZero on October 02, 2003 at 09:47 AM
Message
People for the Ethical Treatment of Z's right? which would include both tt z's and n/a's fairly. I just thought that it would be a good rule to have that the founders of PETZ should have owned both types to fairly judge other PETZ violators both n/a and tt's. I just somehow feel that many on this forum would rather drive something else then have an n/a just because it doesnt produce 350rwp or something. I like my n/a and can go out tomorrow and buy a smz if i liked and get 300rwp or more easily and then talk shit to n/a owners (which i wouldnt) but i dont becuase to me its not only about power and 1/4 mile time. I like driving my car at all speeds. So if the president of PETZ or Founding Members owned n/a and TT's they wouldnt already be judgmental to start with or having a n/a hate thing that you see soo much on the forum, And already almost everyone applies to that. Im sure the ones who dont probably/already have started bitching and crying about it. Just a thought nothing more. Agree or disagree it doesnt really matter to me you know but that's the most I see worthwhile argueing that. Besides my car is PETZ approved :-)
