Subject	Nice job... Isn't that lower than before?
Posted by	degradated on September 27, 2003 at 7:41 PM
	This message has been viewed 31 times.
In Reply To	New Dyno #s (sae corrected)......... posted by Chris(NJ) on September 27, 2003 at 04:14 PM
Message	What was changed?
Follow Ups	New Dyno #s (sae corrected)......... - Chris(NJ) 16:14:20 09/27/03 Change your sig!!!! Your ride looks sooooo much better now! (n/m) - unluky 16:24:26 09/27/03 shaddup :) (n/m) - Bobby12many 16:31:39 09/27/03 Hee-Hee - slacker..... ;-) (n/m) - unluky 16:32:58 09/27/03 Yay! (n/m) - Kenny 9 psi 16:58:13 09/27/03 nice going! want to provide those numbers for my dyno compar - Bernie (OOParts International) 17:38:41 09/27/03 Thanks....ya know, i was halfway through typing it out - Chris(NJ) 17:56:12 09/27/03 Why is it all squiggly after 4500 RPM? (n/m) - BooZted 17:50:44 09/27/03 Most likely ignition. - Chip(GMS Racing) 17:57:06 09/27/03 or could be wastegate varying boost? (n/m) - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 19:14:51 09/27/03 I doubt it. - Chip(GMS Racing) 21:18:59 09/27/03 Is that the highest for sp500? Imagine increasing - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 19:05:48 09/27/03 There's a 485rwhp sport500 AUTO in Ca, think Greg tuned it (n/m) - Kez43 (25mpg) 23:39:38 09/27/03 Was that on race gas or pump? (n/m) - ZPilot(Miami) 09:02:46 09/28/03 Race gas I'm sure.. had to be around ~22psi (n/m) - Kez43 (25mpg) 12:09:57 09/28/03 from what i've seen - Chris(NJ) 19:15:14 09/28/03 Nice job... Isn't that lower than before? - degradated 19:41:16 09/27/03 hp was 10 lower, tq was 21 higher (n/m) - Chris(NJ) 19:15:42 09/28/03 good job homegirl!! (n/m) - Wagz 20:29:09 09/27/03 nice torque! (n/m) - Spee 21:38:09 09/27/03 So are you going to race it now? (n/m) - SR Productions 22:15:09 09/27/03 Next time you're in Bound Brook let me know - hey GotBo0st 12:02:38 09/28/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.